How AI, data infrastructure and research controls are becoming core tools in U.S.-China strategic competition

AI, Data Cables and Tech Rivalry

The Evolving U.S.-China Strategic Competition: AI, Infrastructure, and Alliances Shape the 21st Century Power Balance

In the rapidly shifting landscape of international power, the competition between the United States and China is increasingly defined by technological prowess, strategic infrastructure, and alliance networks. While traditional military and economic rivalries remain significant, the core battlegrounds are now centered on artificial intelligence (AI), data infrastructure, research governance, and maritime power projection. Recent developments—such as new regional logistics hubs, diplomatic engagements, and technological initiatives—highlight how these domains are intertwined in shaping the future of global influence and stability.

Diverging Visions for AI: Resilience versus Rapid Deployment

At the heart of this competition are contrasting approaches to AI development and deployment:

United States: The U.S. emphasizes building resilient, interoperable, and secure AI systems. Initiatives like the Edge AI Package for the Indo-Pacific aim to establish a "Pax Silica," fostering a secure, interconnected AI ecosystem that bolsters surveillance, cyber defense, autonomous operations, and local decision-making. This strategy seeks to reduce reliance on centralized data centers vulnerable to adversarial interference, thus enhancing operational resilience and preserving technological leadership amid rising geopolitical tensions.
China: Conversely, China prioritizes rapid deployment and operational integration of AI across civil-military sectors. As noted by IEEE Spectrum, “The U.S. is doubling down on scaling,” whereas China accelerates AI-enabled maritime, border security, and military systems. Recent reports reveal China’s deployment of autonomous naval vessels, AI-enabled command platforms, and maritime surveillance tools designed to project power in contested regions such as the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. The focus on deployment and operational dominance aims to embed AI swiftly into real-world systems, often blurring civilian and military boundaries.

This divergence influences autonomous systems, cyber-physical security, and the development of international norms—with the U.S. favoring interoperability and innovation, and China emphasizing deployment and strategic dominance.

Infrastructure and Resource Competition: Strategic Corridors, Bases, and Critical Minerals

Control over both physical and digital infrastructure remains a critical arena:

Undersea Data Cables and Digital Corridors: Projects like the $700 million Iraqi-UAE Data Cable exemplify efforts to establish regional digital sovereignty. Connecting Iraq and the UAE, this high-capacity cable is designed to challenge existing routes, such as the Saudi-Syrian link, enhancing resilience and security for civilian and military communications. These infrastructure developments aim to reduce reliance on potentially hostile transit routes, especially amid rising tensions and the competition for global data dominance.
Chinese Maritime Leverage: China's China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and strategic positioning along the Indian Ocean serve as leverage points for military and economic influence. These corridors facilitate AI-enabled maritime surveillance, autonomous naval operations, and secure naval access, particularly through chokepoints like the Strait of Malacca, expanding China's maritime influence into South Asia and the Middle East.
Critical Minerals and Undersea Resources: The competition extends into regions abundant in cobalt, lithium, and rare earth elements, essential for AI hardware, semiconductors, and batteries. Africa, with its rich mineral deposits, is emerging as a strategic theater where the U.S. and China vie for access. Securing these resources is vital for technological sovereignty and economic dominance.
Strategic Military Bases: Key sites such as Diego Garcia remain vital for AI-enabled maritime surveillance and autonomous naval deployments. Recent developments include the approval of a new Philippine Luzon Strait base, designed to strengthen regional deterrence against Chinese maritime assertiveness. This base, along with ongoing efforts to deepen alliance networks, underscores the importance of infrastructure and partnerships in maintaining a regional balance of power.

Maritime Gray Zone Tactics and Autonomous Platforms: Risks and Escalation

The maritime domain continues to be a focal point for hybrid tactics, often operating below the threshold of open conflict:

Maritime Militia and Autonomous Vessels: Incidents such as the seizure of Japanese trawlers exemplify ongoing maritime harassment by Chinese maritime militia, frequently enabled by AI and autonomous vessels. These actions serve as strategic signals of assertiveness, allowing China to maintain pressure without full-scale conflict.
Autonomous Maritime Platforms: The deployment of AI-powered surveillance drones and autonomous ships near sensitive waters like the South China Sea heighten miscalculation risks. These systems support hybrid warfare tactics, blending military, economic, and informational strategies, raising concerns over unintentional escalation.
Regional Tensions: Such actions exemplify hybrid tactics designed to maximize ambiguity and maintain strategic pressure, but they also increase the risk of misjudgment that could spiral into broader conflict if not carefully managed.

Expanding Alliances and Networked Defense Architectures

Both the U.S. and China are actively cultivating alliances and developing networked security frameworks:

U.S. Indo-Pacific Partnerships: The U.S. is strengthening ties with India, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam, and France—particularly in AI-enabled defense systems, autonomous maritime patrols, and cyber capabilities:
- India: Engaged in joint AI research and military summits to develop interoperable platforms capable of countering Chinese influence.
- Japan and Philippines: Recent investments, including a $144 million aid package, bolster maritime surveillance and autonomous systems in the South China Sea.
- Vietnam: Focuses on cybersecurity and autonomous defense modernization.
NATO and IP4 Maritime Networks: Insights from Korean expert 오인환 highlight NATO’s efforts to involve Indo-Pacific partners in maritime security frameworks like the International Permanent Forum on the Indo-Pacific (IP4). These networks aim to coordinate autonomous operations, share intelligence, and counter Chinese maritime assertiveness. However, challenges such as trust deficits, technological disparities, and geopolitical complexities remain.
China’s Maritime Expansion: China leverages CPEC and its maritime Belt and Road Initiative to secure autonomous capabilities along vital waterways, expanding influence throughout South Asia and beyond.

Adding to this, the UK’s Indo-Pacific strategy emphasizes advanced strike capabilities, such as the PrSM anti-ship missile, capable of targeting Chinese naval assets at ranges up to 1,000 km, influencing regional deterrence dynamics.

Legal and Policy Shifts: Regulatory Changes and Strategic Impacts

Recent legal and regulatory developments continue to shape the technological and strategic landscape:

U.S. Supreme Court’s IEEPA Ruling: A recent decision against the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) may limit the scope of U.S. sanctions, potentially weakening leverage over Chinese technological advancements. This could alter enforcement of restrictions on semiconductors, AI hardware, and dual-use technologies, impacting global supply chains and technology transfer policies.
Export Controls and Research Governance: Measures like the SAFE Research Act aim to regulate international research collaboration and technology transfer. Evolving legal frameworks might reshape international cooperation, affect access to advanced technologies, and slow innovation.

Space and Satellite Domains: The Final Frontier

Strategic competition extends into space, where both powers seek dominance:

Earth Observation and AI Analytics: Satellites such as NASA’s NISAR and commercial constellations provide AI-driven monitoring of maritime activities, infrastructure, and environmental changes. These systems enhance decision-making but also increase weaponization risks, as both nations develop anti-satellite capabilities.
Satellite Weaponization and Defense: Advancements in satellite jamming, direct-ascent anti-satellite weapons, and space-based surveillance are ongoing. Recent discussions stress the importance of international norms and treaties to prevent destabilizing behaviors in orbit.

Recent Strategic Developments

Adding to the broader picture are notable recent initiatives:

Approval of a Subic Bay Ammunition Hub: The Philippines and the U.S. have approved plans for a Subic Bay ammunition storage hub, significantly strengthening U.S.-Philippine logistics and forward basing. This development enhances regional deterrence and reflects a strategic shift toward more resilient and agile regional military infrastructure capable of supporting autonomous maritime operations.
High-Level Diplomatic Engagements: The U.S. State Department has engaged in discussions with Pacific Island leaders at the East-West Center, focusing on regional security and capital projects. These conversations aim to strengthen alliances, promote infrastructure investment, and coordinate efforts to counterbalance Chinese influence across the Indo-Pacific.

Implications and Strategic Outlook

The latest developments underscore a more contested and complex Indo-Pacific environment:

China’s accelerated military modernization, including its nuclear submarine program and maritime expansion, challenge U.S. naval dominance.
The Philippines’ new Luzon Strait base and enhanced logistics hubs like Subic Bay strengthen regional deterrence.
The U.S. maintains its focus on investing in resilient infrastructure, deepening alliances, and technological innovation—though legal shifts like the IEEPA ruling could alter strategic leverage.
The race for AI and data dominance persists, with both nations pushing forward amid increasing tensions.

However, the risk of miscalculation or unintended escalation remains high if international norms for autonomous systems, cyber tools, and space activities are not reinforced. Responsible governance, transparency, and multilateral cooperation are imperative to manage competition and prevent conflict.

Navigating the Maritime Power Transition and Alliance Dynamics

Insights from 오인환 emphasize the U.S.–China maritime power transition and the ongoing restructuring of NATO-IP4 maritime networks. These efforts highlight the importance of integrated maritime strategies, trust-building among allies, and technological interoperability to counterbalance Chinese assertiveness. Addressing challenges like trust deficits and technological disparities is critical for maintaining regional stability.

Conclusion

The strategic competition centered on AI, data infrastructure, and research governance is fundamentally transforming global power dynamics. While the U.S. champions resilience and innovation, China accelerates deployment and operational dominance, each pursuing distinct pathways with profound implications for international stability. Recent developments—such as the Philippines’ new military logistics hubs and diplomatic engagements—highlight the evolving landscape where infrastructure and alliances are as critical as technological superiority.

The path forward demands responsible leadership, multilateral engagement, and ethical governance to manage the risks of escalation and steer this competition toward stability and shared prosperity. Without concerted efforts, the potential for miscalculations and conflict increases, threatening the peace and security of the Indo-Pacific and beyond.

Sources (26)