Grizzly bear management shift to states
Key Questions
What is the proposed change in grizzly bear management?
The Interior Department plans to shift more authority and flexibility to states and tribes for managing grizzlies where populations exceed recovery objectives, such as in Greater Yellowstone. No hunting is allowed under the current 4(d) rule.
Why are conservation groups opposing the grizzly management shift?
Groups argue the change could weaken federal protections despite population growth from 136 to over 1,000 in some areas. They emphasize ongoing needs for coordinated conservation and public safety measures.
How might this policy affect grizzly encounters and safety?
State-led management could lead to more localized responses to conflicts and encounters. Expert commentary on grizzly status continues to stress safety practices like carrying spray in affected regions.
DEVELOPING. Interior Secretary Burgum announces grizzly management shift to states, but no hunting allowed under 4(d) rule. Conservation groups push back. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposes rule allowing state/tribal management in areas where bears exceed objectives (e.g., Greater Yellowstone from 136 to 1,000+ bears). This major policy change directly affects bear encounters and management. Expert commentary on grizzly status and safety also added.