Asia-Pacific Geopolitics Digest

Semiconductors, AI competition, and technological power in the Asia-Pacific

Semiconductors, AI competition, and technological power in the Asia-Pacific

Asia-Pacific Tech and AI Rivalry

The 2026 Asia-Pacific Tech Power Struggle: Semiconductors, AI, and Undersea Infrastructure Shape Regional and Global Stability

The Asia-Pacific region in 2026 remains at the epicenter of a fierce and multifaceted contest for technological, military, and strategic dominance. Driven by accelerating efforts in semiconductor self-reliance, groundbreaking advances in artificial intelligence (AI), and control over vital undersea communication and energy infrastructure, the geopolitical landscape is transforming rapidly. This high-stakes competition involves not only traditional military posturing but also intricate diplomatic realignments and resource battles, with profound implications for regional stability and global power dynamics.

Escalating Military Posturing and Undersea Tensions

Recent developments reveal an intensification of military deterrence strategies across the Indo-Pacific. The United States has deployed advanced missile defense systems in Northern Luzon, signaling a clear intent to safeguard regional stability amid China's expansive maritime ambitions. These missile systems, coupled with expanded naval patrols by Japan, South Korea, and Australia, exemplify a collective effort to secure maritime interests and deter potential aggression.

Japan, emerging from its post-World War II pacifist stance, is asserting itself as a more proactive security partner. The country has increased defense cooperation with the U.S. and regional allies, providing patrol aircraft, military equipment, and security assistance to Pacific island nations. Japan’s Defense Minister has emphasized, “It is essential for Pacific island nations to work together in ensuring maritime security, protecting sovereignty, and maintaining open sea lanes,” underscoring the strategic importance of regional collaboration.

Undersea and Submarine Rivalry

Adding a critical dimension to regional tensions, underwater submarine activity has surged in the South China Sea. Reports indicate intensified patrols, covert operations, and technological advancements in submarine capabilities by multiple nations, signaling an evolving underwater contest for strategic dominance. An investigative report, “The Secret Submarine Game: Inside the Underwater Standoff in the South China Sea,” details how submarines—both conventional and autonomous—are central to intelligence gathering, deterrence, and potential escalation scenarios.

This underwater rivalry raises the risk of miscalculations, especially given persistent sovereignty disputes over vital shipping routes. The deployment of autonomous submarines capable of both conventional and cyber-espionage operations underscores a new frontier in regional security, where underwater assets are increasingly pivotal in shaping military balance.

Diplomatic Realignments and Strategic Alliances

Diplomatic efforts are accelerating to forge resilient security and technological partnerships. The US, Japan, South Korea, and India are deepening their cooperation through multilateral frameworks:

  • The US-Japan-South Korea trilateral has expanded its scope to include technology sharing, joint military exercises, and cybersecurity initiatives.
  • The United States has intensified engagement with India, emphasizing diversified supply chains, technology standards, and countering Chinese influence. Recent high-level talks have prioritized semiconductor supply chain resilience and AI collaboration.
  • The Philippines has become a key strategic partner, especially following recent agreements like the Seventy Years On security pacts with Japan, which have strengthened bilateral defense cooperation and regional security architecture.

Additionally, the Philippines–Japan/US defense cooperation has evolved into a more integrated framework, reflecting a shared goal of counterbalancing Chinese maritime expansion and enhancing regional deterrence.

The Technological Race: China’s Push for Self-Reliance and Military AI

China’s Accelerated Semiconductor and AI Programs

Despite export restrictions—particularly on EUV lithography tools from Dutch firm ASML—China has intensified efforts toward semiconductor self-reliance. Massive investments are flowing into domestic chip design, indigenous fabrication, and advanced manufacturing capabilities, aiming to reduce dependency on Western technology. These efforts are driven by a strategic goal to sustain military modernization, with advanced chips crucial for AI-driven autonomous systems, cyber warfare, and high-performance computing.

China is also integrating AI into its military systems at an unprecedented pace. Developments include autonomous drones, cyberattack platforms, and surveillance systems, forming the backbone of China’s doctrine of speed, precision, and strategic advantage. Chinese officials publicly state their aim of achieving technological self-sufficiency and modernizing their military with AI-enabled capabilities.

US and Allied Countermeasures

In response, the US and regional allies are enacting robust countermeasures:

  • Export controls on advanced manufacturing equipment are designed to curtail China’s progress.
  • Massive investments are being made in domestic semiconductor fabs, supported by public-private partnerships, to diversify supply chains.
  • Strategic resource management is gaining prominence, with efforts to secure critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements—key ingredients for high-tech manufacturing.

Resource Control and Undersea Infrastructure

Control over critical minerals remains pivotal in sustaining technological competitiveness. Countries like Australia, India, and Canada are forging new resource-sharing agreements—notably the US-Indonesia deal on nickel—aimed at reducing reliance on China and securing vital supply lines.

Simultaneously, the importance of undersea cables—which underpin regional communications, energy transfer, and data flow—has become more evident. Recent reports, “Wired for Power: The Geopolitics of Subsea Cables in the South China Sea,” highlight vulnerabilities in these underwater arteries. Disruptions or sabotage could have catastrophic impacts on regional connectivity, prompting nations to harden subsea infrastructure and develop redundant communication networks.

Emerging Risks: Cyber Threats, Autonomous Systems, and Norms

The rapid deployment of AI-enabled military and civilian systems introduces significant security vulnerabilities:

  • Incidents of AI-powered cyberattacks targeting ports, energy grids, and navigation systems have caused regional disruptions.
  • The proliferation of autonomous vessels, drones, and missile systems accelerates, but also raises escalation risks, especially if norms governing AI warfare and cyber operations remain undefined or unenforced.

A recent cyberattack on key ports exemplifies the urgent need for international norms and regulations to prevent misuse, accidental escalation, and strategic destabilization.

Broader Geopolitical and Policy Dynamics

Diverging Climate and Energy Strategies

The US and China’s diverging approaches to climate policy and clean energy influence regional trade and technological standards. The US emphasizes renewables, electric vehicles, and green tech, while China invests heavily in clean coal, rare earth processing, and battery manufacturing. These strategies impact supply chain configurations, market leadership, and technological innovation trajectories.

Trade Uncertainties and Policy Shifts

Recent tariff rulings—including a Supreme Court decision affecting trade policies—add uncertainty to regional supply chains. These shifts incentivize diversification of sources and alliances, with countries seeking to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain economic resilience amid geopolitical tensions.

Policy Implications and the Path Forward

To navigate this volatile environment, regional and global actors must:

  • Strengthen multilateral norm-setting for AI, cybersecurity, and autonomous systems to prevent escalation.
  • Diversify and secure supply chains, particularly for semiconductors and critical minerals, to reduce dependencies.
  • Harden undersea infrastructure against sabotage, develop redundant communication networks, and monitor submarine activities closely.
  • Sustain diplomatic frameworks such as the Quad, ASEAN, and bilateral alliances to manage tensions and foster cooperation.

Failure to develop effective norms and cooperative strategies risks escalating conflicts, potentially destabilizing the regional order and challenging global security.

Current Status and Outlook

As 2026 progresses, the Asia-Pacific remains a hotbed of technological innovation and strategic rivalry. China’s relentless pursuit of semiconductor independence and military AI continues to challenge US-led technological dominance, while regional alliances evolve to counterbalance Chinese influence.

Undersea tensions, resource competition, and cyber vulnerabilities underscore the region’s fragility. The future trajectory hinges on diplomatic engagement, norm development, and strategic prudence. These elements will determine whether this high-stakes competition results in stability through cooperation or escalation through confrontation.

In summary, the Asia-Pacific in 2026 is a complex tapestry of innovation and confrontation, where technological prowess and military strength are the currencies of influence. The region’s ability to manage its strategic challenges responsibly will shape regional stability and global security for years to come. Leadership in technology, diplomacy, and norm-setting will be crucial in transforming this competitive landscape into a more resilient and cooperative order.

Sources (27)
Updated Feb 26, 2026