How persistent inflation, wage/shelter dynamics and balance-sheet policy shape the Fed’s reaction function

The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy environment in mid-2026 remains a complex and evolving landscape, shaped by entrenched inflation pressures, intricate balance sheet dynamics, and shifting market expectations. Recent developments have reinforced the Fed’s “higher-for-longer” interest rate stance, as persistent inflation drivers, internal policy debates, and ongoing liquidity strains continue to challenge the central bank’s reaction function. Meanwhile, financial markets have adjusted sharply, reflecting deep uncertainty over the timing of rate cuts and the durability of inflation moderation.

---

Inflation Persistence and Structural Drivers Intensify

Core inflation remains notably resilient, with the Core PCE Price Index stubbornly near 2.9% year-over-year, well above the Fed’s 2% target. The persistence of inflation owes much to several entrenched factors:

• Shelter inflation remains the primary anchor. Despite a slight easing in new housing starts, elevated mortgage rates above 6% continue to restrict housing supply. This keeps Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER) and rental prices elevated, as highlighted by the December New York Fed inflation gauge. Recent data show no meaningful abatement, suggesting shelter costs will continue to underpin core inflation in the near term.

• Service-sector wages exhibit sticky upward pressure. Sectors such as healthcare, hospitality, and professional services face ongoing labor shortages and skill mismatches, sustaining wage growth that feeds directly into service inflation. This labor market tightness is complicated by immigration-related dynamics, which the IMF has flagged as a factor delaying inflation normalization.

• Tariff-driven input cost pressures persist as a complicating factor. The reinstatement of a 15% global tariff on key imports continues to elevate production costs. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard recently emphasized that tariffs materially impede disinflation, adding a layer of price rigidity that the Fed must factor into its policy calculus.

• Elevated and well-anchored inflation expectations risk fueling wage-price spirals. The Fed’s Third District 2026 Q1 Price and Inflation Expectations Survey revealed firms anticipate ongoing price increases, reinforcing a potential inflation feedback loop.

• IMF’s cautious outlook reinforces Fed’s prolonged tightening bias. The IMF projects only a single U.S. rate cut this year and delays a return to the Fed’s 2% inflation target until 2027, explicitly citing tariff policy and immigration-related labor market constraints as key impediments.

Emerging consumer-level data and nuanced cost-of-living measures further underscore the structural nature of current inflation pressures, suggesting headline GDP inflation metrics may understate these persistent dynamics.

---

Fed’s Internal Debate Sharpens: Hawkish Voices Gain Ground Amid Balance Sheet Concerns

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) continues to grapple with sharply divergent views on the appropriate policy trajectory:

• The January 2026 FOMC meeting held the federal funds target rate steady at 3.50%–3.75%, but the meeting revealed growing hawkish dissent advocating further rate hikes amid persistent inflation.

• The updated dot plot shows a wider dispersion, with several policymakers endorsing higher terminal rates and deferring rate cuts into late 2027 or beyond, reflecting deep uncertainty about the inflation outlook.

• Fed Governor Stephen Miran upgraded his year-end rate forecast to 2.75%, signaling a hawkish tilt within the committee.

• Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee stressed that meaningful inflation improvement is a prerequisite for easing, calling current readings “not good enough” to justify rate cuts.

• Fed Governor Christopher Waller described the March 2026 rate decision as a “coin flip,” underscoring the committee’s split.

• The recent nomination of former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh to a key policymaking role has intensified calls for faster quantitative tightening (QT). Warsh argues for accelerating balance sheet runoff to complement rate policy, warning that insufficient QT risks entrenching inflation.

• Conversely, Chair Jerome Powell and other senior officials caution against overly rapid QT, warning of the risk that swift balance sheet contraction could trigger liquidity shortages and destabilize markets.

• Discussions at the recent SUERF-Baffi Bocconi conference highlighted central bank capital adequacy concerns amid tightening, adding a new dimension to the debate on balance sheet policy.

• Fed Governor Lisa Logan expressed a more moderate view, emphasizing that current policy rates appear “well positioned,” illustrating the nuanced spectrum of perspectives within the Fed.

This internal tug-of-war encapsulates the Fed’s broader challenge: calibrating the pace and mix of tightening tools amid persistent inflation, fragile liquidity, and evolving economic fundamentals.

---

Liquidity Strains Persist, Complicating Policy Transmission

Monetary tightening continues to strain short-term funding markets, prompting ongoing Fed intervention:

• The Fed has recently injected $18.5 billion into the overnight repo market to ease persistent funding stresses, signaling that despite a restrictive stance, liquidity conditions remain fragile.

• These interventions highlight the delicate balance the Fed must maintain—tight enough financial conditions to curb inflation, yet sufficient liquidity to avoid disruptions in credit flow and market functioning.

• Market participants closely watch repo activity and short-term funding metrics as barometers of the Fed’s ability to transmit policy without triggering systemic stress.

---

Market Pricing Embraces “Higher-for-Longer” Amid Elevated Volatility and Dollar Strength

Financial markets have sharply recalibrated in response to the Fed’s hawkish signals and persistent inflation data:

• The probability of a rate cut by March 2026 has fallen to roughly 23%, down markedly from earlier expectations exceeding 50%, signaling diminished near-term easing prospects.

• The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield, after briefly surpassing 4.2% early in the year, has retraced to about 4.04% as of late May, reflecting cautious investor positioning ahead of key inflation data.

• The U.S. dollar index has staged its largest weekly gain since October 2025, defying earlier expectations of depreciation amid rate cut uncertainty. This resilience is fueled by market skepticism over near-term easing and a “flight to quality” amid global uncertainties.

• Safe-haven assets, such as gold and silver, have experienced heightened volatility; for instance, gold prices swung nearly $100 intraday following January FOMC minutes, reflecting market jitters amid fragile liquidity.

• Equity markets remain volatile and range-bound, grappling with the interplay of inflation data, Fed policy signals, and episodic liquidity interventions.

• External analysts, including Piper Sandler’s chief global economist, describe an intensifying “wall of worry” among investors, fostering heightened caution and risk aversion.

Treasury yield stabilization amid these dynamics suggests markets are digesting Fed communications carefully, awaiting clearer inflation signals to recalibrate positioning.

---

Conclusion: Navigating a Protracted and Complex Road to Inflation Normalization

As 2026 advances, the Federal Reserve faces a persistently challenging policy environment shaped by deeply entrenched inflation drivers—particularly sticky shelter costs, resilient service-sector wages, and tariff-induced price pressures. Structural labor market tightness, evolving immigration patterns, and productivity shifts further complicate the traditional inflation-policy nexus.

Internally, the Fed wrestles with competing pressures: hawkish advocates pushing for higher terminal rates and accelerated quantitative tightening, exemplified by Kevin Warsh’s nomination, versus Chair Powell’s cautionary stance on liquidity risks and market functioning. Ongoing repo market strains and targeted liquidity injections underscore the difficulties in transmitting monetary tightening smoothly.

Financial markets have embraced a durable “higher-for-longer” interest rate regime. Expectations for near-term rate cuts have receded substantially, term premia remain elevated, and volatility persists across fixed income, FX, precious metals, and equities. While moderating growth tempers some concerns, it does not yet justify a policy pivot—consistent with Chair Powell’s data-dependent approach focused on returning inflation sustainably to 2%.

---

Key Monitoring Areas for Stakeholders

To effectively navigate the evolving Fed reaction function and broader macro-financial environment in the coming months, close attention is warranted on:

• Shelter inflation trends, including OER and rental market dynamics
• Service-sector wage developments amid labor market tightness and immigration shifts
• Firm-level inflation expectations and pricing behavior surveys
• Fed communications, including FOMC minutes, dot plot updates, and dissenting views
• Progress and pace of balance sheet runoff and quantitative tightening
• Short-term funding market conditions, repo activity, and liquidity interventions
• Tariff policy developments and their ongoing inflation transmission effects
• Global economic factors and IMF forecasts, particularly immigration and trade impacts

These indicators will be critical in assessing the Fed’s policy trajectory, inflation outlook, and financial market stability throughout 2026 and beyond.