Election Integrity Hub

Trump's false election claims and state legal resistance

Trump's false election claims and state legal resistance

Trump in Georgia, States Push Back

The Ongoing Battle Over Election Legitimacy: Trump’s False Claims, State Resistance, and the Path Forward

As the United States approaches critical electoral moments, the persistent efforts by former President Donald Trump and his allies to delegitimize the 2020 election continue to shape the political landscape. Despite widespread bipartisan rejection, court dismissals, and proactive security measures, the false narrative of a stolen election persists—fueling misinformation, threatening election officials, and challenging the foundational principles of American democracy.

Trump’s Continued Efforts to Undermine the 2020 Results

Since the 2020 presidential vote, Trump has tirelessly propagated claims of widespread voter fraud and systemic manipulation. His recent rhetoric has become even more aggressive, with public rallies and statements framing the election as illegitimate and warning that future contests could face similar undermining. Notable tactics include:

  • Pressuring state officials: In Georgia, Trump publicly urged officials to “find” enough ballots to overturn the certified results, directly challenging state sovereignty and the integrity of the electoral process.
  • Disseminating misinformation: False claims about voting machines, mail-in ballots, and election procedures continue to circulate, often lacking credible evidence. These narratives are designed to energize his base and erode public trust.
  • Inciting distrust and unrest: Rhetoric around “finding votes” and “rigged systems” not only distort electoral processes but also risk inciting civil unrest and voter suppression motivated by fears of fraud.

With the upcoming electoral cycles, these falsehoods threaten to further distort political discourse, complicate election administration, and undermine confidence in democratic institutions.

State-Level Resistance and Proactive Preparations

Despite Trump’s persistent false claims, state and local officials have demonstrated resilience through various measures:

  • Georgia’s robust audits and recounts: Multiple audits, signature verifications, and recounts have reaffirmed the security and accuracy of Georgia’s 2020 results. The Secretary of State’s office and bipartisan election officials have publicly declared “there is no credible evidence of voter fraud or machine tampering” after thorough investigations.
  • Legal dismissals: Dozens of lawsuits attempting to overturn election results have been dismissed across federal and state courts, emphasizing the lack of credible evidence behind claims of irregularities and underscoring the robustness of electoral processes.
  • Security enhancements: Law enforcement agencies, including Fulton County Police, have increased security at election sites to protect personnel and prevent unrest. These measures recognize the threat posed by disinformation and political violence.
  • State-level strategic planning:
    • “War game” exercises: State attorneys general and election officials are conducting simulations to prepare for potential disinformation surges, legal disputes, and threats to election officials—aiming to strengthen resilience and coordination.
    • Infrastructure upgrades: For example, North Carolina has established bipartisan commissions to modernize voting systems by replacing outdated equipment with more secure, cyber-resistant technology, reducing vulnerabilities ahead of future elections.

Federal and State Interactions: Oversight, Security, and Cooperation

The federal government has increased its involvement amid ongoing disinformation campaigns and threats. Recent developments include:

  • Voter data requests by the DOJ: The Department of Justice has formally requested detailed voter registration and ballot processing data from multiple states, including Georgia and Wisconsin. These efforts aim to identify vulnerabilities and detect interference, foreign or domestic, in election processes.
  • Debates over federal oversight versus state sovereignty: Many state officials view these data requests with suspicion, perceiving them as an extension of Trump’s false claims and an infringement on state control. Critics warn of privacy concerns and the risk of politicization.
  • Recent DHS and FBI security calls:
    • The Department of Homeland Security has held calls with election officials from across the country, emphasizing collaborative efforts to secure the electoral process.
    • Notably, DHS assured election officials that ICE will not be present at polling places during the midterms, countering unfounded rumors and emphasizing focus on protecting voters and election workers.

These ongoing federal-state interactions highlight the delicate balance between federal oversight and state control, especially as disinformation continues to threaten public confidence.

Protecting Election Officials and Securing the Process

One of the most troubling consequences of the post-2020 environment has been the rise in threats, harassment, and intimidation targeting election officials and poll workers. Many report unprecedented hostility, which:

  • Endangers their safety
  • Disrupts vote counting and certification processes
  • Discourages qualified individuals from serving in election roles

In response, states are implementing enhanced security measures, providing training for election workers, and enacting policies to protect officials—particularly in swing states like Michigan and Georgia. Such efforts are vital to maintaining the independence and integrity of election administration, ensuring that democracy remains resilient against targeted disruptions.

Legal and Policy Developments: Countering Misinformation and Protecting Voting Rights

Recent weeks have seen significant legal and policy actions:

  • Court dismissals of fraud claims: Numerous lawsuits alleging election fraud have been dismissed, reaffirming the integrity of the electoral process and emphasizing the lack of credible evidence.
  • Challenges to mail voting: New legal cases threaten to restrict or complicate mail-in voting access, citing security concerns but risking voter disenfranchisement and undermining confidence.
  • Fact-checking initiatives: Ahead of high-profile events like the State of the Union, fact-checkers are preparing to scrutinize claims and counter misinformation, aiming to preserve factual accuracy and counter disinformation campaigns.

Recent Developments Enhancing Security and Preparedness

Several new developments underscore ongoing efforts to fortify election security:

  • Exclusive: State election chiefs are huddling to plan responses to Trump’s expected interference in midterms. These meetings focus on coordinating responses to potential disinformation, legal challenges, and threats to election officials.
  • Colorado election officials participate in security call with DHS and FBI. The Department of Homeland Security assured election officials from across the country that DHS will continue to support election security efforts, emphasizing collaboration and preparedness.
  • ICE will not be at polling places during the midterms, a Trump appointee at DHS clarified to state election officials. This reassurance was in response to rumors and fears that immigration enforcement would interfere with voting, and it emphasizes priority on voter safety and trust.

Implications for the Midterms and the Future of Democracy

The upcoming midterm elections serve as a critical test of the nation’s resilience against disinformation and efforts to delegitimize electoral outcomes. The collective measures—state-level security drills, system upgrades, federal-state cooperation, and public education campaigns—are designed to safeguard voting rights and maintain public confidence.

However, several risks remain:

  • The continued spread of false claims can diminish trust in election results.
  • Legal challenges to voting procedures threaten to restrict access and suppress turnout.
  • Political hostility and threats to election officials jeopardize the administration of free and fair elections.

The strength of American democracy now depends on coordinated efforts across all levels of government, a robust legal framework, and informed voters committed to upholding democratic principles.

Current Status and Outlook

As of now, the resilience of U.S. elections remains strong, thanks to the dedication of election officials, courts, law enforcement, and federal agencies. The midterms will be a decisive moment: success hinges on vigilance against disinformation, security measures, and protecting voting rights.

The ongoing battle to preserve electoral legitimacy is far from over. While challenges persist, the emerging consensus underscores that the collective resolve of institutions and citizens can withstand efforts to undermine democracy. The coming months will be pivotal in shaping the future of American electoral integrity—determining whether every vote remains free, fair, and protected from interference.

Sources (18)
Updated Feb 26, 2026