Power Competition Digest

How Europe, Asia and other actors recalibrate policies in response to Russia’s aggression

How Europe, Asia and other actors recalibrate policies in response to Russia’s aggression

Global Reactions to Russia’s War and Realignment

How Europe, Asia, and Global Actors Recalibrate Policies in Response to Russia’s Aggression

The ongoing conflict initiated by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has profoundly reshaped the geopolitical landscape across Europe, Asia, and the broader international community. As Russia continues to modernize its military arsenal, expand its strategic reach, and deepen alliances, global actors are adjusting their policies to counterbalance these moves, ensuring regional stability and safeguarding international norms.

Europe’s Strategic Response: Defense Reinforcement and Technological Innovation

In Europe, the response to Russia’s aggression remains multifaceted. European nations are dramatically increasing defense spending, with some advocating for allocations as high as 5% of GDP toward military capabilities. These investments focus on modernizing forces—upgrading military bases, expanding surveillance infrastructure, and deploying ice-capable naval vessels to prepare for intensified Arctic activity.

Arctic Geostrategic Significance

The Arctic has emerged as a critical strategic theater. Russia has been reinforcing its presence on Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya, asserting control over vital shipping routes such as the Northern Sea Route (NSR). Melting ice due to climate change has opened new maritime corridors, increasing the region’s economic and military importance. European NATO members are investing heavily in technological innovations—including AI, autonomous systems, and cyber defense—to counter hybrid threats and maintain technological sovereignty amid evolving security challenges.

Diplomatic and Economic Measures

Europe is also actively strengthening diplomatic and economic measures. Efforts include renewing and updating arms control frameworks, especially as the New START Treaty approaches expiration in 2026. The urgency to establish verification regimes for emerging military technologies—such as hypersonic weapons and autonomous systems—has increased. Meanwhile, the European Union is exploring trade tools to reduce dependency on US and Chinese supply chains, aiming to foster strategic autonomy and resilience against external pressures.

Russia’s Deepening Alliances: China, Iran, and BRICS

Russia’s strategic calculus is increasingly intertwined with its partnerships across Asia and beyond. Its alliance with China has intensified, marked by joint naval exercises in contested waters like the Gulf of Oman and cooperative development of hypersonic and autonomous military systems. This partnership seeks to counterbalance US and NATO influence, complicating regional security dynamics.

Arctic Cooperation and Resource Control

In the Arctic, Russia and China are accelerating collaboration in resource extraction and military cooperation, aiming to dominate mineral-rich zones and shipping lanes. Their joint efforts reflect a shared interest in controlling critical infrastructure amid the changing climate and geopolitical pressures.

BRICS and Eurasian Power Dynamics

The BRICS bloc—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has become a pivotal component of this shifting Eurasian order. Russia’s engagement with BRICS demonstrates a strategic effort to diversify alliances and reduce reliance on Western economies, especially amid sanctions and economic pressures. These alliances also serve as platforms for economic cooperation, technology sharing, and political coordination against Western-led norms.

Russia and Iran

Russia’s relationship with Iran continues to evolve as a strategic axis in the Middle East. Moscow provides diplomatic and military support to Tehran, especially as Iran faces US and allied pressures. This partnership enhances Russia’s influence across Eurasia and the Middle East, challenging Western dominance and shaping regional power balances.

Hybrid Warfare and Technological Escalation: Evolving Tactics

Russia’s hybrid warfare tactics remain central to its strategy. Recent developments include cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and targeted strikes on energy and logistical infrastructure. The attack on the Votkinsk Machine Building Plant exemplifies Ukraine’s efforts to challenge Russia’s military-industrial complex directly.

Deployment of Advanced Weapons

Russia is emphasizing hypersonic weapons, particularly the Avangard system, capable of Mach 20 speeds, posing significant challenges to existing missile defenses. The deployment of these systems on Borei-class submarines and the expansion of military bases in the Arctic underscore Russia’s strategic ambitions.

Cyber and Information Warfare

Information warfare and cyber threats are integral to Russia’s hybrid tactics. State-sponsored social media manipulation, cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure, and disinformation campaigns aim to destabilize adversaries and undermine Western cohesion. These layered tactics increase the risk of escalation and complicate verification efforts.

Asia’s Evolving Dynamics and the U.S.–China Relationship

While Europe’s focus remains on deterring Russia and strengthening NATO, Asia presents its own complex landscape. The evolving U.S.–China relationship—which has experienced moments of tension and signals of stabilization—significantly influences regional balancing strategies.

Regional Responses and Power Balances

Countries like India and Japan are recalibrating their policies amid these shifts. India, maintaining a nuanced stance, balances relations with both the U.S. and China, while Japan emphasizes deterrence and alliance strengthening. Both nations are investing in advanced military technology and cyber capabilities to bolster regional resilience.

Tech and Trade Policy Recalibrations

Regional powers are also adjusting tech and trade policies to navigate the shifting global order. There is increased focus on strategic autonomy, with nations seeking to reduce reliance on Western or Chinese supply chains, especially in critical sectors like semiconductors and AI.

Signals of Stabilization

Recent reports, such as the "Trivium Weekly Recap", suggest that U.S.-China relations are on a tentative path toward stabilization, though underlying strategic competition persists. This cautious approach aims to prevent escalation while maintaining national interests.

Global Responses: Deterrence, Resilience, and Arms Control

International responses continue to prioritize deterrence and resilience. NATO and European allies are modernizing their militaries, increasing budgets, and strengthening regional defenses. Simultaneously, renewed arms control negotiations focus on verification protocols for hypersonic and autonomous weapons, seeking transparency and stability in emerging technologies.

Strategic Autonomy and International Stability

Across the globe, there is a concerted effort to maintain strategic autonomy—balancing alliances and independent capabilities—to prevent broader conflicts. Despite efforts at diplomacy, the growing technological proliferation and military modernization raise concerns about miscalculations and escalation.

Current Status and Future Outlook

Russia’s continued modernization, Arctic expansion, and hybrid tactics, combined with its deepening alliances with China, Iran, and BRICS members, are recalibrating the global security architecture. European and allied strategies focus on deterrence, resilience, and diplomatic engagement to manage escalating risks.

The evolving Eurasian order underscores the importance of transparency, confidence-building measures, and international cooperation. Failure to adapt and address these challenges risks further instability, miscalculations, and potentially wider conflicts.

In sum, the post-2022 geopolitical environment is characterized by a complex interplay of military modernization, alliance realignments, hybrid tactics, and technological proliferation. The global community’s ability to navigate these dynamics will determine the future stability of the international order.

Sources (22)
Updated Feb 28, 2026