How global risk, AI and policy are reflected in markets and macro indicators
Markets, Macro and 2026 Risk
Navigating 2026: The Interwoven Dynamics of Geopolitics, AI, Resource Competition, and Market Resilience
The year 2026 stands out as a pivotal juncture in global affairs, defined by a complex interplay of strategic realignments, technological competition, and resource struggles. These forces are not operating in isolation; instead, they form a web that influences markets, policy decisions, and geopolitical stability. Recent developments underscore that understanding this multifaceted landscape is essential for policymakers, investors, and businesses striving for resilience amid persistent volatility.
The Multipolar World: A New Geopolitical Paradigm
One of the defining features of 2026 is the deepening multipolarity in international relations. The United States, traditionally the dominant superpower, now navigates a landscape where China, Russia, the European Union, and emerging regional powers exert significant influence.
"The logic of globalization has shifted," explains a recent analysis by LGT, emphasizing that national security priorities now drive strategic decisions, reshaping trade, alliances, and technological collaborations. Countries are increasingly engaging in "alliance audits," reassessing partnerships in light of shifting hegemonic influences and emerging threats. This transition complicates the global order, leading to a more fragmented yet interconnected geopolitical environment.
The US in a Multipolar World
The United States faces the challenge of maintaining influence while adapting to a world where power is more dispersed. Its strategies involve reinforcing alliances, investing in technological sovereignty, and countering China's expanding influence through initiatives like the Indo-Pacific Partnership and tech export controls. Yet, the US also recognizes that collaboration with Europe and other partners remains vital, especially in addressing shared threats like cyberwarfare and resource security.
Persistent Geostrategic Volatility: Conflicts, Risks, and Market Reactions
Geopolitical tensions continue to dominate market sentiment. Notably:
-
Iran–US tensions remain high, with recent reports revealing fears that Iran's missile capabilities could target US assets or allies. A recent Gravitas LIVE segment highlights concerns that Iran might escalate missile strikes, potentially targeting US bases or regional allies, which would significantly disrupt energy and trade routes.
-
Middle East tensions persist, with Iran conducting military drills and asserting maritime assertiveness, threatening vital energy transit corridors. These developments keep energy markets volatile, supporting safe-haven flows into gold and USD.
-
The war in Ukraine persists despite diplomatic efforts, sustaining European uncertainty and pushing commodity prices upward. European markets remain sensitive to any escalation or diplomatic breakthroughs, reflecting risk aversion that drives gold prices over 1% and forecasts suggest gold could reach $6,200 in the near term.
Iran-US Tensions: A Growing Threat
The recent focus on Iran’s missile program underscores the potential for escalation. Experts warn that missile strikes could target US military bases or regional allies, exacerbating regional instability and risking broader conflict. This heightened tension feeds into energy supply fears, with disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz or other key choke points threatening global oil markets.
Systemic Stress and the Limits of the Current Global Order
The international system is showing signs of strain. Recent signals from the United Nations and other multilateral institutions reveal diverging visions of governance and security. The Tenth UN Secretary-General has emphasized that the post-war rules-based order is under increasing pressure, with sanctions, unilateralism, and geopolitical rivalries challenging the global consensus.
"The global order is at a crossroads," he notes, highlighting the limits of current institutions to manage conflicts and address climate change, resource scarcity, and technological competition. This systemic rupture is prompting more countries to conduct strategic audits of alliances and supply chains, seeking to reduce dependence on uncertain partners.
Reaffirming Key Themes: Resources, AI, Military Modernization, and Supply Resilience
Resource Frontiers: Arctic and Seabed Minerals
Environmental changes, particularly melting ice in the Arctic, continue to open new strategic and economic frontiers. Greenland's mineral exploration is accelerating, as deposits of rare earth elements—crucial for AI hardware, battery technology, and green investments—become accessible. The U.S. military is increasing its Arctic footprint, aiming to secure energy reserves and rare earth supplies, vital for technological sovereignty.
Additionally, seabed exploration is gaining prominence. Countries like Japan are diversifying supply sources by exploring seabed mud for rare earths, especially in response to Chinese dominance of critical mineral markets. The "Wired for Power" report underscores the importance of subsea cables as the backbone of global communication and energy transfer—vital in contested regions such as the South China Sea and Arctic corridors.
AI and Digital Sovereignty
Artificial intelligence remains a central strategic asset. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) now integrates AI-driven infrastructure projects, expanding influence and supply chain control. Europe’s digital sovereignty initiatives have tripled their budgets from 2025 to 2027, emphasizing indigenous AI development to reduce dependence on US and Chinese giants.
Private sector innovation continues apace:
- Alibaba’s Qwen3.5 exemplifies efforts to develop AI tools that bolster national security and economic competitiveness.
- The dispute between Anthropic and the Pentagon underscores rising tensions over AI military applications and export controls, with Anthropic disputing access to advanced models. This exemplifies how AI mastery is now a geopolitical battleground.
Military Modernization and Maritime Power
Naval capabilities are expanding rapidly:
- China, Russia, and emerging littoral states are investing heavily in modernizing fleets to project influence and protect strategic sea lanes.
- India, Australia, and Southeast Asian nations are bolstering maritime assets, signaling a shift toward militarized diplomacy amid rising regional tensions.
In the Middle East, Iran’s naval drills continue to threaten energy trade routes, prompting regional powers to recalibrate military strategies and alliances.
Policy Responses: Building Resilience Amidst Turbulence
In response, nations are adopting multifaceted strategies:
- Supply chain diversification is accelerating, with companies establishing strategic reserves of critical materials like rare earths and energy.
- The recent US Supreme Court ruling invalidating Trump-era tariffs** introduces legal and political uncertainties, prompting reassessment of trade policies.
- Investment in cyber and AI resilience is surging, with the deployment of digital twin technologies, projected to reach USD 24.4 billion, to enable real-time risk management and disruption prediction.
- Governments are prioritizing renewables, next-generation nuclear, and AI-resilient infrastructure to reduce dependence on volatile fossil fuels and meet climate commitments.
Recent Key Developments: Strategic Recalibration at the Global Level
China and Europe: Deepening Economic and Technological Ties
Recent high-level meetings between Xi Jinping and German Chancellor Merz signal efforts to stabilize supply chains and expand technological cooperation. These discussions reflect China’s broader strategy to counterbalance U.S. influence and strengthen ties with Europe, emphasizing mutual interests in economic stability.
Russia’s Focus on Bioeconomy
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s speech at the Future Technologies Forum unveiled Russia’s bioeconomy strategy, emphasizing biotechnologies, genomics, and bio-based industries. This pivot aims to enhance technological sovereignty and economic diversification, aligning with broader efforts to mitigate sanctions and reduce dependency on Western markets.
Current Status and Broader Implications
The convergence of geopolitical tensions, technological competition, resource scarcity, and military modernization paints a picture of a world in flux. Critical frontiers like the Arctic and seabed minerals are becoming hotly contested, driven by environmental change and strategic imperatives.
Alliances are being recalibrated:
- Countries are "audit-ing" their partnerships, seeking more resilient supply chains and strategic reserves.
- The multipolar landscape makes cooperation and conflict more intertwined, with sanctions, export controls, and diplomatic engagements shaping the new order.
The interplay of climate change, resource demand, and technological sovereignty accelerates this transformation, posing both risks and opportunities. Those who recognize and adapt—through resilient infrastructure, international cooperation, and technological innovation—will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty and foster stability in this turbulent epoch.
In sum, 2026 exemplifies a world where geopolitics, AI, resource competition, and military innovation are deeply interconnected. The evolving landscape demands vigilant strategic planning, agile policy responses, and sustained innovation to secure a resilient future amid ongoing upheavals.