Navigating the Turbulent Geopolitical Landscape of AI in 2026: Fragmentation, Authoritarian Resurgence, and Long-Term Risks

As 2026 unfolds, the global AI ecosystem stands at a crossroads shaped by escalating geopolitical tensions, technological sovereignty pursuits, and systemic shifts in international norms. The once unified effort to harness AI for human progress now faces fragmentation, authoritarian retrenchment, and an uncertain future—raising critical questions about the long-term trajectory of global security, stability, and human rights.

---

The Rise of Sovereign and Regional AI Ecosystems

In response to intensifying strategic competition, nations are accelerating efforts to onshore AI infrastructure, semiconductor manufacturing, and secure supply chains to safeguard technological sovereignty.

• The United States, leveraging initiatives like CoreWeave, is strengthening its capacity to handle large-scale AI workloads independently of external disruptions. This move aims to maintain technological resilience amid a multipolar world where reliance on foreign supply chains becomes increasingly risky. An insightful analysis by LGT underscores that the U.S. perceives itself as navigating a multipolar landscape, where national security takes precedence over global integration, leading to a decentralization of technological power.

• Europe is pursuing strategic autonomy with robust investments in institutions such as IMEC, emphasizing ethical standards and norm-setting to counterbalance global influence. Europe's push to shape AI standards independently reflects a broader desire to protect democratic values amid rising systemic divergence—a trend highlighted in discussions around "Diverging Visions" at the UN, where differing national interests threaten to fracture the post-war world order built on shared norms.

• Japan is repositioning within this multipolar landscape by focusing on domestic innovation and regional influence, seeking to maintain relevance in a shifting global arena where alliances are fluid and influence is dispersed.

Bilateral and Regional Alliances

Efforts to diversify supply chains and reduce dependency are exemplified by:

• The India–EU Free Trade Agreement, crafted to counter China's dominance in critical sectors such as semiconductors and rare earth elements (REEs). This alliance aims to foster resilience and technological independence, countering Beijing’s resource control strategies.

• China, meanwhile, capitalizes on its REEs resource advantage, exemplified by Alibaba’s launch of Qwen3.5, which leverages access to critical materials to sustain its global technological influence despite external sanctions. This move underscores China's strategic emphasis on resource control as a foundation for AI and biotech dominance.

---

Strategic Levers and Rising Tensions: Resources, Infrastructure, and Energy

The escalating compute demands of advanced AI models have intensified competition over vital resources:

• Rare earths, largely controlled by China, remain a focal point. Countries are actively seeking alternative sources and investing in recycling to reduce dependency—a move driven by the risk of supply disruptions.

• Semiconductors are at the heart of this rivalry, with export controls imposed by the U.S., Japan, and Netherlands aimed at limiting China's AI development capacity. These measures are part of a broader effort to prevent technological leapfrogging and maintain strategic advantage.

• To onshore critical manufacturing, nations like India are investing heavily in R&D and domestic production, while the European Union is ramping up efforts to develop resilient, autonomous supply chains capable of withstanding external shocks—a move to safeguard long-term AI growth.

Energy Security as a Critical Factor

As AI models become increasingly compute-intensive, countries recognize the necessity of sustainable energy solutions:

• The development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and nuclear energy is gaining momentum as a reliable, low-carbon energy source capable of meeting long-term AI compute demands.

• Countries are exploring nuclear innovations to address the climate concern while ensuring steady energy supplies for their rapidly growing AI sectors, exemplifying the convergence of energy security and technological sovereignty.

---

Erosion of Global Governance and Normative Fragmentation

Diminishing Multilateral Influence

Institutions like the United Nations and NATO are experiencing waning influence, as nations favor bilateral and regional security arrangements. This shift hampers collective efforts to set AI standards, enforce security norms, and uphold human rights.

• The "Diverging Visions" paper highlights how differing UN member states are moving toward independent normative frameworks, risking systemic rupture in international cooperation.

Europe's Strategic Autonomy

Europe’s push for independent leadership is exemplified by articles such as "Europe Doesn’t Trust America Anymore – And It’s Bigger Than Trump," which depict Europe's initiatives to shape AI standards and security policies independently of the U.S. This trajectory risks accelerating regional divergence and fragmenting global AI norms, potentially undermining collective security.

Unilateral Security Initiatives and New Alliances

• The announced ‘Board of Peace’ by former U.S. President Donald Trump signals a move toward nationalist security architectures, which could undermine multilateral efforts to manage AI risks.

• The emerging web of alliances includes:

  • China, emphasizing self-reliance and regional influence.
  • India, promoting multilateral engagement and resilience.
  • The EU, championing democratic standards and ethical norms.

---

Authoritarian Resurgence and Repression

AI-Enabled Surveillance and Social Control

Authoritarian regimes are increasingly deploying AI-powered surveillance, social scoring, and autonomous repression mechanisms:

• China and Russia are expanding their AI tools to monitor populations, suppress dissent, and control information flows. Recent reports indicate widespread surveillance networks, justified by security narratives, which facilitate autocratic stability at the expense of civil liberties.

• Iran exemplifies the dangerous intersection of AI repression and political unrest. Since late 2025, mass protests over economic hardship and repression continue to erupt, with a recent YouTube video titled "Iran Protest Death Toll Explodes as Trump Claims 32,000 Killed" estimating 32,000 protesters killed. This underscores the human toll of authoritarian AI-driven repression, as Iran’s regime employs AI-enabled surveillance to monitor and quash dissent, though deep unrest signals growing instability with potential regional spillovers.

Regional Spillovers and Instability

The Iran–US tensions are intensifying, with recent U.S. fears over Iranian missile capabilities possibly targeting American interests. A Gravitas LIVE report highlights Tehran's missile threats, complicating regional stability and adding a layer of geopolitical volatility that could accelerate conflict escalation.

---

Military AI and Hotspot Risks

The proliferation of autonomous weapons and AI-enabled military systems heightens conflict risks:

• Ukraine has integrated AI-driven autonomous systems into combat operations, marking a shift toward automation in warfare.

• Tensions in Taiwan and the Middle East, especially involving Iran, are exacerbated by AI-powered military capabilities, raising fears of miscalculations and escalation.

• Export controls and alliance dynamics are shaping the balance of power, with China and Russia bolstering military AI to counter Western advantages.

---

Great-Power Signaling: Russia and China

Russia’s Bioeconomy and Technological Sovereignty

Recent speeches, including Putin’s keynote at the Future Technologies Forum, reveal Russia’s ambition to integrate bioeconomy initiatives into its broader technological sovereignty strategy. Emphasizing biotech, AI, and resource control, Russia aims to bolster national strength and self-reliance amid a shifting global order. This signals a long-term vision of technological independence, leveraging biotech as a new frontier.

China–Europe Engagements

High-level China–Europe dialogues suggest a strategic push for cooperation in technology sectors, even amid geopolitical tensions. These discussions reflect China’s ambitions to shape global tech standards and expand influence through bilateral agreements, while Europe seeks to manage risks and protect economic interests—a delicate balance with profound implications for global norms.

---

Policy Implications and the Way Forward

To navigate this fragmented and volatile landscape, coherent, proactive policies are critical:

• Developing interoperable, ethical AI standards to prevent normative fragmentation and protect human rights.

• Strengthening domestic governance to ensure transparency, civil liberties, and sovereignty—especially concerning surveillance and military applications.

• Diversifying supply chains and securing critical minerals to mitigate dependencies on unstable regions, reducing strategic vulnerabilities.

• Revitalizing multilateral engagement through UN and other global bodies to set inclusive norms, enforce accountability, and manage long-term AI risks.

---

Current Status and Long-Term Trajectories

As 2026 advances, the multipolar world characterized by fragmentation, authoritarian consolidation, and conflict potential presents both perils and opportunities. The ongoing Iran unrest, driven by AI-enabled repression, exemplifies how authoritarian regimes deploy AI tools to deepen domestic crises, with regional and global repercussions.

Simultaneously, Russia’s bioeconomy ambitions and China–Europe high-level cooperation highlight great-power strategies aimed at technological sovereignty—but also risk deepening divisions.

The choices made—whether to foster shared norms and resilience or succumb to fragmentation and repression—will ultimately shape the future. The path forward hinges on global leadership committed to inclusive, ethical development of AI, ensuring it remains a force for human progress, not division.

In conclusion, the evolving landscape demands vigilance, collaborative innovation, and robust governance to mitigate risks and harness AI’s potential for long-term stability and prosperity.