How compute, power and minerals underpin the AI boom

AI Infrastructure, Energy and Critical Inputs

How Compute, Power, and Minerals Underpin the AI Boom: New Developments Reshape Global Dynamics

The race for global AI dominance has transcended mere technological innovation, evolving into a complex geopolitical contest over the foundational pillars that enable artificial intelligence: compute infrastructure, energy security, and critical mineral supplies. Recent geopolitical shifts, strategic industry investments, and technological breakthroughs are dramatically reshaping the global landscape, creating a new multipolar order where nations and corporations vie for influence, resilience, and strategic autonomy.

The New Geography of Compute Infrastructure: Decentralization and Sovereignty

Historically, control of AI compute infrastructure has been concentrated among a few dominant tech giants—Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Alibaba Cloud. However, recent developments signify a paradigm shift toward regionalization and sovereign control.

Emergence of Localized Compute Hubs: Companies like CoreWeave are pioneering regional compute ecosystems aimed at reducing dependence on global giants. These hubs improve data sovereignty, reduce latency, and accelerate domestic AI innovation. Countries wary of geopolitical decoupling—particularly between the US and China—are investing heavily to foster such infrastructure, emphasizing autonomous, secure AI ecosystems.
National and Strategic Investments: Governments worldwide now prioritize building domestic data centers and regional cloud infrastructure. The concept of "Sovereign AI" has become central, reflecting the understanding that control over AI ecosystems is a strategic national security concern. Industry voices proclaim that "Sovereign AI is a geopolitical reset— and telcos need to deliver it," highlighting the critical role of telecommunication networks in enabling secure, autonomous AI systems.
Development of Domestic Large Language Models: Major corporations such as Alibaba are advancing homegrown large language models like Qwen3.5. These initiatives demonstrate technological prowess and foster national AI leadership, especially amid export restrictions and technology decoupling. This aligns with broader self-sufficiency strategies driven by national strategic goals.
New Alliances and Supply Chain Diversification: Recent collaborations, such as IMEC—a leading semiconductor research institute—and the India-European Union Free Trade Agreement (FTA), exemplify a geopolitical pivot. As analyzed in "IMEC + India-EU FTA: The Geopolitical Pivot Rewriting Global Trade,", these partnerships are creating alternative supply corridors, fostering technological cooperation, and reducing reliance on traditional superpowers like the US and China. These alliances are critical in reshaping resilient, diversified compute supply chains.

Powering AI: The Critical Role of Energy Infrastructure

AI’s computational demands are among the most energy-intensive processes today. Ensuring reliable, low-carbon energy supplies is crucial—not only for sustainability but also for uninterrupted AI development.

Rise of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): The development of SMRs offers a scalable, safe, and low-carbon solution for large-scale AI data centers. Their ability to operate continuously makes them ideal for powering high-demand AI workloads. Regions aiming to reduce fossil fuel dependence—especially given geopolitical instability—are increasingly viewing SMRs as strategic energy assets.
Integration of Renewables and Nuclear Power: Advances in solar photovoltaic technology and nuclear energy are now integrated into AI infrastructure planning. Combining renewables with nuclear energy ensures cost-effective, resilient, and sustainable energy supplies. Given AI’s exponentially growing energy needs, hybrid energy systems are vital to prevent bottlenecks and mitigate geopolitical risks, particularly in regions such as the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and parts of Africa experiencing instability.
Regional Energy Risks and Strategic Policies: Regions facing instability—such as the Middle East, Ukraine, and Africa—pose risks to energy security, potentially delaying or limiting AI infrastructure growth. Strategic policies focusing on diversifying energy sources, investing in renewables, nuclear energy, and regional energy interconnections are increasingly central to future energy resilience for AI ecosystems.

Critical Minerals and Hardware: Securing the Raw Materials

AI hardware—including semiconductors, chips, and memory modules—relies heavily on critical minerals, especially Rare Earth Elements (REEs) and precious metals.

Strategic Significance of REEs: These minerals are indispensable for manufacturing high-performance chips and advanced electronic components. Control over REE supply chains directly influences hardware deployment speed and AI capacity expansion.
China’s Dominance and Strategic Leverage: China maintains a near-monopoly on REE processing and refining, granting it substantial strategic influence over global hardware supply chains. Recent export restrictions and diplomatic tensions highlight vulnerabilities—potentially leading to hardware delays and AI development setbacks elsewhere.
Diversification and Recycling Efforts: Recognizing these vulnerabilities, US, Australia, and European nations are investing in domestic mineral extraction, processing capacities, and recycling programs. Projects like rare earth mining in Australia and European recycling initiatives aim to reduce dependency on Chinese processing and foster resilient supply chains.

Geopolitical Shifts and Strategic Alliances: A Multipolar Contest

The AI infrastructure race is deeply intertwined with geopolitical realignments that influence resource access, technological cooperation, and supply chain resilience:

India-EU Collaboration and IMEC: The partnership between IMEC and the India-EU FTA exemplifies a multipolar shift toward technological cooperation beyond traditional superpower influence. As discussed in "IMEC + India-EU FTA: The Geopolitical Pivot Rewriting Global Trade,", this alliance creates new supply chain corridors, fosters collaborative innovation, and reduces reliance on US-China dominance.
Japan’s Strategic Recalibration: Japan is emphasizing technological independence and regional influence, positioning itself as a regional hub for AI hardware and energy resilience. Recent initiatives focus on domestic mineral sourcing and advancing nuclear energy.
China’s Diplomatic and Economic Strategies: China continues leveraging its economic diplomacy through initiatives like the Belt and Road. It is securing resource access and technological cooperation across Asia, Africa, and Europe, aiming to maintain dominance over supply chains vital for AI infrastructure.
Regional Flashpoints and Risks: Increasing hydropolitical tensions, conflicts, and energy disputes—notably in the Middle East and Eastern Europe—pose risks to resource and energy security. Recent escalations, such as Iran-US tensions and fears of missile attacks, underscore how regional instability can delay AI infrastructure expansion and shift alliances further. The "Iran-US Tensions" video highlights the potential for conflict escalation, which could threaten critical supply routes and energy supplies.

Security Challenges and Governance

The rapid expansion of AI infrastructure introduces significant vulnerabilities that demand robust governance frameworks:

Cybersecurity Threats: As AI data centers and supply chains grow more complex, they become prime targets for cyber espionage, sabotage, and state-sponsored cyberattacks. High-profile incidents, including tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon, illustrate the security vulnerabilities inherent in industry-government collaborations. Industry leaders emphasize the urgent need for international cybersecurity standards and norms to prevent disruptions.
Dual-Use and Military AI Risks: The proliferation of autonomous AI systems—particularly in military applications—raises risks of escalation, miscalculations, and weaponization. The documentary titled "Inside Anthropic's Standoff with the Pentagon" underscores tensions around dual-use AI, highlighting how industry-government friction can influence deployment and regulation.
Supply Chain Volatility: Dependence on critical minerals and energy markets, vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and sanctions, can lead to market instability and deployment delays. These vulnerabilities highlight the importance of diversified sourcing, recycling, and strategic reserves.
Global Governance: Addressing these risks necessitates international cooperation through norms, standards, and policy frameworks that manage security threats, prevent misuse, and promote sustainable development.

Current Status and Future Outlook

Recent developments underscore a landscape marked by heightened competition and strategic recalibration:

Industry Moves: Companies like Alibaba are advancing domestically developed models such as Qwen3.5, signaling a focus on self-reliance amidst export restrictions and decoupling pressures.
Strategic Alliances: The IMEC-India/EU partnership exemplifies a multipolar shift, creating new supply chain corridors and collaborative innovation hubs that diversify global influence and reduce dependency on traditional superpowers.
Energy and Mineral Investments: Significant investments are underway in nuclear infrastructure, notably SMRs, and in critical mineral diversification, including domestic mining and recycling programs, to meet AI’s expanding hardware and energy demands.
Security and Governance: Growing awareness of cybersecurity vulnerabilities and dual-use AI risks is prompting calls for international norms and cooperative frameworks to mitigate threats.

Implications for the Future

The future of AI leadership hinges on who controls its enablers:

Resilience and Sovereignty: Building diversified, resilient supply chains—for compute, energy, and minerals—is essential to counter geopolitical risks and sustain innovation.
International Cooperation: Establishing global norms, standards, and policy frameworks will be critical to manage security threats, prevent misuse, and drive sustainable development.
Domestic Capabilities and Alliances: Countries investing in self-sufficiency in compute infrastructure, energy, and critical minerals, while forging new strategic alliances, will be better positioned to lead in this multipolar AI era.

As the global landscape continues to shift, balancing technological advancement with resilience, security, and geopolitical strategy will determine which nations and corporations emerge as the true AI frontrunners in the decades ahead. The ongoing competition underscores that control over the fundamental enablers of AI—compute, power, and minerals—is not just about technological supremacy but about shaping the geopolitical order itself.

Sources (16)