Malware stealing openclaw.json API keys and secrets

OpenClaw Configs Targeted by Infostealer

The cybersecurity threat landscape targeting OpenClaw’s automation framework continues to intensify, with new attack vectors and rapidly evolving adversary tactics significantly raising the stakes for organizations relying on this platform. At the heart of this escalation remains the critical vulnerability posed by the openclaw.json configuration file, which stores long-lived API keys and service tokens in plaintext. This file has become the prime target for infostealer malware and now, following the disclosure of a critical remote code execution vulnerability, a gateway to large-scale, automated compromise.

From Credential Theft to Remote Code Execution: A Sharpening Threat

Initially, threat actors focused primarily on stealing the openclaw.json file via infostealer malware to harvest persistent API credentials. These secrets enable attackers to bypass authentication, execute unauthorized automation workflows, and infiltrate communication platforms such as WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, and increasingly region-specific services like Feishu (飞书), DingTalk (钉钉), and QQ. Such access allows adversaries to:

Automate malicious operations stealthily within enterprise environments
Pivot laterally using the broad toolset embedded in OpenClaw agents
Evade detection by leveraging legitimate tokens and workflows

A high-profile case illustrating these risks was the Meta AI researcher inbox hijack, where attackers exploited stolen OpenClaw credentials to commandeer internal communications and propagate further compromise.

The threat landscape worsened dramatically with the publication of CVE-2026-XXXX, an unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in OpenClaw’s always-on Gateway daemon. This flaw, uncovered by the Deep Priority Security Team, stems from a logic error in URL parameter parsing that enables arbitrary code execution remotely—without requiring prior access or malware implants. Consequences of this vulnerability include:

Remote extraction of authentication tokens directly from openclaw.json
Elimination of initial infection barriers, enabling mass exploitation
Potential rapid worm-like spread across networked OpenClaw deployments

This shift from local infostealers to remote exploitation vastly broadens OpenClaw’s attack surface, making immediate patching and hardening imperative.

Architectural and Operational Vulnerabilities Amplify Risk

Several fundamental design and deployment factors contribute to OpenClaw’s exposure:

Plaintext Secret Storage: The openclaw.json file, typically located in user directories like ~/.openclaw/config.json, contains API keys and tokens in unencrypted plaintext. Any process with user-level permissions or malware running on the host can extract these secrets effortlessly.
Always-Running Gateway Daemon: This persistent service expands the window of vulnerability, offering a continuous remote attack surface that can be leveraged for exploitation like the CVE-2026-XXXX RCE.
Extensive Tool and Skill Set: OpenClaw includes over 25 tools and 53 skills—from filesystem manipulation to browser automation and push notifications—that attackers can misuse to establish deeper footholds and move laterally within compromised environments.
Multi-Agent Architectures: Emerging deployment models, such as multi-agent setups documented in Chinese developer communities (e.g., a five-agent AI orchestration over Discord), introduce complexity in securing inter-agent communications and secrets, increasing the difficulty of comprehensive defense.
Regional IM Platform Integrations: Projects like BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china extend OpenClaw’s reach into dominant Asian messaging ecosystems (Feishu, DingTalk, QQ), broadening operational scope but simultaneously enlarging the attack surface with diverse APIs and credential management challenges.

Emerging Attack Techniques: Accelerated Exploitation and NPM Bypass

Recent analysis, highlighted in the “Faster Cyberattacks, OpenClaw NPM Bypass, SkillsBench Human Guidance | Ep.52” briefing, reveals a worrying trend of accelerated attack campaigns leveraging newly discovered OpenClaw weaknesses. Key points include:

OpenClaw NPM Bypass: Attackers have found ways to circumvent existing NPM package security controls, enabling them to inject malicious payloads into OpenClaw workflows without triggering standard safeguards. This technique accelerates compromise by embedding malicious code directly into automation scripts.
Human-in-the-Loop Guidance (SkillsBench): Malicious actors increasingly exploit the SkillsBench framework, which integrates human guidance into AI agent workflows, to manipulate agent behavior in real-time, effectively turning OpenClaw into a remote attack platform with human-assisted adaptability.
Faster Attack Cycles: Combined with RCE exploitability, these tactics enable adversaries to rapidly compromise targets, extract secrets, and propagate payloads before defenses can respond.

These evolving tactics underscore the urgency for defenders to enhance detection capabilities and restrict attack surfaces aggressively.

Community and Vendor Responses: Patching, Architectural Innovation, and Best Practices

In response to these mounting threats, the OpenClaw community and vendors have mobilized to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture:

Urgent Security Patches: Following disclosure of CVE-2026-XXXX, the OpenClaw development team released immediate patches to remediate the RCE flaw. Organizations are strongly advised to deploy these updates without delay to close the remote attack vector.
Starlink4SAPI Initiative: This architectural overhaul replaces the legacy always-on Gateway daemon with a modular, API-driven interface that:
- Eliminates the persistently running Gateway, shrinking the persistent attack surface
- Introduces granular access controls tightly integrated with modern secret management solutions
- Enhances operational flexibility while reinforcing security boundaries
Cloud Provider Deployment Guidance: Leading providers such as Alibaba Cloud and Tencent Cloud have published best practice frameworks emphasizing:
- Avoidance of persistent local storage of openclaw.json by leveraging ephemeral environment variables or encrypted vaults
- Strict network segmentation and firewall rules to block unauthorized access
- Integration of cloud-native endpoint detection and response (EDR), behavioral analytics, and anomaly detection tools for real-time breach monitoring

Collectively, these efforts offer a multi-pronged defense strategy to harden OpenClaw environments.

Recommended Defensive Measures: A Comprehensive, Layered Approach

Given the dual risks of credential theft and remote exploitation, organizations are urged to implement a robust, multi-layered security framework to protect OpenClaw deployments:

Encrypt Configuration Files: Employ filesystem-level encryption (LUKS, BitLocker) or application-layer encryption to secure openclaw.json against unauthorized access.
Strict Access Controls: Restrict file permissions aggressively—minimum necessary users and processes only—to minimize insider threat and lateral movement potential.
Automated Credential Rotation: Enforce regular rotation of API keys and tokens to limit attacker dwell time in the event of compromise.
Deploy Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Monitor for anomalies such as unusual file access patterns, suspicious process executions, and unexpected network connections related to OpenClaw agents.
Apply Least-Privilege Principles: Disable or restrict high-risk tools and skills within OpenClaw, particularly those enabling filesystem writes, remote code execution, or broad network communications.
Develop Incident Response Playbooks: Establish clear procedures for rapid API key revocation, forensic investigations, and communication protocols to contain and remediate breaches swiftly.
Harden Network Security: Employ firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and zero-trust network segmentation to limit OpenClaw services’ exposure and block known exploit attempts.
Isolate Multi-Agent Deployments: Architect multi-agent environments with strict role separation, privilege isolation, and secure inter-agent communication channels to contain compromise impact.

Balancing Flexibility with Security: Architectural Trade-Offs

OpenClaw’s design philosophy prioritizes agility and ease of use, with plaintext external configuration files enabling rapid deployment and updates. However, this approach inherently magnifies the risk of secret leakage and exploitation.

Alternatives like NanoClaw, which embed configurations into compiled binaries, mitigate secret exfiltration risks but reduce operational flexibility and increase update complexity. Organizations must carefully balance:

The need for dynamic configuration changes against the security imperative of encrypted secrets
Maturity and enforcement capabilities of secret management and access control policies
The effectiveness of monitoring and incident response to detect and contain breaches rapidly

Achieving a secure yet agile automation framework requires deliberate architectural decisions aligned with organizational risk tolerance and operational needs.

Conclusion: Securing the “Keys to the Kingdom” in a Rapidly Evolving Threat Landscape

The threats targeting OpenClaw’s openclaw.json have escalated from local credential theft by infostealers to remote code execution exploits capable of mass token exfiltration and automated compromise. The disclosure of CVE-2026-XXXX marks a watershed moment, expanding the attack surface and demanding immediate action.

Real-world incidents like the Meta AI inbox hijack illustrate the severe consequences of compromised automation agents. Encouragingly, accelerated community responses—including urgent patching, the Starlink4SAPI initiative, and cloud provider best practices—offer a roadmap to mitigating these risks.

Ultimately, defending OpenClaw deployments requires a proactive, layered security strategy combining encrypted secret storage, strict access controls, credential rotation, behavioral monitoring, and well-rehearsed incident response plans. Only through such rigor can organizations protect the “keys to the kingdom” within openclaw.json and prevent their automation frameworks from becoming vectors for widespread enterprise compromise.

Organizations leveraging OpenClaw must prioritize immediate patching, adopt hardened deployment architectures, and embed security as a foundational principle—transforming their automation platforms from vulnerable entry points into resilient assets within their digital infrastructure.

Sources (13)