States Juggle Income, Property, and Business Tax Overhauls Amid Legal, Federal, and Operational Challenges

As the 2026 tax season looms, U.S. states are undertaking an unprecedented wave of ambitious and often contentious tax reforms. These efforts aim to reshape fiscal policies to stimulate economic growth, promote social equity, and secure sustainable revenue streams. However, a complex web of legal disputes, partisan divides, federal policy shifts, and operational constraints is creating a landscape marked by both opportunity and uncertainty.

Widespread Tax Reforms and Innovations Across States

Across the country, states are experimenting with a broad spectrum of tax policy changes tailored to regional priorities:

Income Tax Reductions and Eliminations

• Missouri continues its bold campaign to eliminate personal income tax entirely. The state argues that such a move would attract high-income earners and spur economic activity through increased investment, business expansion, and job creation. Critics warn that these sweeping cuts could cause significant revenue shortfalls, putting critical funding for education, healthcare, and infrastructure at risk.
• In West Virginia, a 10% statewide income tax cut aims to ease the tax burden on higher earners and stimulate local economic growth, aligning with efforts to make the state more competitive and appealing to residents and businesses alike.

Property Tax Relief and Abolition Movements

• States experiencing demographic shifts, such as Florida, Tennessee, and North Carolina, are expanding property tax exemptions and homestead protections to improve affordability and attract new residents.
• Florida is intensifying residency audits to prevent part-time residents from exploiting tax advantages, aiming to protect its tax base amid a surge of new arrivals.
• A growing movement advocates for full property tax abolition, particularly targeting middle- and working-class families. Critics argue that such measures could undermine local revenues, threatening funding for essential services like education, infrastructure, and public safety.

Industry Incentives and Sector Policies

• Many states are scaling back targeted incentives for sectors like data centers, emphasizing fiscal responsibility and transparency to prevent misuse of public funds and ensure benefits are maximized across broader communities.

Additional State Initiatives

• Connecticut has proposed new tax credits and rebates, including a $400 rebate, to provide immediate relief to residents facing rising costs.
• Ohio is considering aligning its deductions with federal law to streamline compliance and reduce administrative burdens.
• Recent proposals also include tax reforms for savings plans and adjustments to estate and inheritance taxes, which could significantly impact wealth transfer strategies and social equity debates.

Legal Battles and Partisan Divides Reshape Policy Outcomes

Legal conflicts and partisan disagreements are increasingly influencing the trajectory of these reforms:

• California’s Wealth Tax Proposal

  • California has introduced a one-time wealth tax targeting billionaires, taxing 5% of net worth to fund public services and reduce income inequality. The proposal faces legal challenges, with opponents arguing it may violate constitutional protections and pose administrative difficulties. The state's administration is reviewing its legality, but Governor Gavin Newsom remains committed, emphasizing taxing the wealthy as a progressive revenue strategy.

• Montana’s Property Tax Litigation

  • Montana’s property tax assessment practices are under judicial review amid allegations of unfair valuations. Critics contend these practices threaten constitutional protections and could disrupt revenue stability, potentially affecting public service funding. The outcome may delay or force revisions to local tax mechanisms, impacting state budget forecasts.

• Arizona’s Partisan Standoff

  • Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed a comprehensive Republican-led tax overhaul, citing concerns about revenue stability and funding for essential programs. This veto highlights deep partisan divides that hinder efforts to enact substantial reforms.

• Idaho’s Legal Victory

  • The Idaho Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutionality of the parental choice tax credit, marking a significant win for education-focused tax policies and school choice initiatives aligned with conservative agendas.

Federal Policy Shifts and Operational Challenges Intensify Uncertainty

Federal developments are adding further complexity to state-level reforms:

• Interim Guidance on Clean Energy Tax Credits

  • The U.S. Treasury Department and IRS issued interim rules on Section 45X and Section 48E credits related to clean energy investments on February 12. These guidelines address restrictions on foreign investments, particularly focusing on Chinese entities involved in renewable energy projects.
  • Industry leaders warn that these regulations may reshape state-level incentive programs, shift industry investments, and introduce uncertainty into the growing clean energy sector. Delays in project execution and investment flow are possible as stakeholders adjust to the new compliance landscape.

• State Decoupling and Policy Divergence

  • States like Oregon are considering decoupling from federal reforms such as the "Big, Beautiful Bill" to maximize benefits or avoid adverse impacts. On February 16, the Oregon Senate approved a partial decoupling measure, allowing the state to retain certain federal provisions while adopting others selectively.
  • This divergence risks disrupting industry planning, altering revenue forecasts, and complicating compliance efforts for multistate operators.

• IRS Operational Struggles

  • The IRS continues to struggle with severe staffing shortages, with only about 2% of the needed personnel hired. These shortages threaten enforcement efforts during the 2026 tax season, risking processing delays, backlogs, and reduced compliance, which could undermine public trust and further complicate revenue collection.

Recent Policy Developments and Taxpayer-Facing Changes

Additional updates are shaping the taxpayer landscape:

• State-Level Reforms and Relief Measures

  • Connecticut plans to implement new tax credits and rebates, including the $400 rebate, to help residents cope with rising costs.
  • Ohio is exploring tax deduction alignment with federal law to simplify filings and reduce compliance costs.
  • Maine is debating federal conformity, which will influence state revenue estimates and taxpayer liabilities.

• Impact of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" (OBBBA)

  • The "no tip on tax" rule, part of the OBBBA, was designed to simplify tax procedures but has led to administrative challenges in hospitality and service sectors. Businesses face compliance complexities and risk of tax evasion issues.
  • Recent revisions to Form 6765 instructions and guidance on bonus depreciation for buildings are enabling businesses to accelerate deductions, affecting state conformity decisions and investment strategies.

• Tax Benefits for Seniors and Wealth Transfers

  • The IRS has launched new resources to assist seniors in maximizing refunds, amid staff shortages that threaten processing delays.
  • States are adjusting estate and inheritance taxes, with some raising thresholds or eliminating them, prompting shifts in wealth transfer planning and broadening social equity discussions.

IRS Guidance on Depreciation and Industry Incentives

A key recent development involves IRS interim guidance on depreciation deductions:

Title: How the Latest CAMT Guidance Impacts the R&E Deduction
The IRS and Treasury Department have issued interim rules concerning special depreciation allowances for qualified production property (QPP), including research and experimental (R&E) expenses. This guidance clarifies eligibility criteria, claiming procedures, and compliance requirements for businesses investing in manufacturing equipment and renewable energy assets.
The intent is to streamline depreciation claims, reduce ambiguity, and encourage investment at a time when federal incentives are evolving due to geopolitical tensions and shifting industry priorities.
Industry experts note that this guidance could significantly influence how companies structure investments, maximize deductions, and align with state conformity—factors that will be critical as states consider adopting or adjusting their own depreciation rules.

The Bipartisan Budget Deal: A Double-Edged Sword

The recent bipartisan budget agreement has further complicated the landscape:

Title: The bipartisan budget deal rewards tax cheats and sets up the IRS to fail – The Tax Law Center
While designed to prevent government shutdowns and fund key priorities, critics argue that the deal limits IRS enforcement funding, thereby weakening compliance efforts.
Experts warn that the resource constraints resulting from the deal could widen tax gaps, reduce enforcement against high-income tax evaders, and undermine public confidence. This, in turn, could make it more difficult for states to enforce tax laws effectively, especially as federal and state policies become increasingly intertwined.

Implications for Revenue, Compliance, and Public Trust

The confluence of these developments is already impacting taxpayer behavior and revenue projections:

• Higher Refunds and Behavioral Responses

  • Data show average refunds are nearly 11% higher this year, driven by expanded credits and adjusted withholding strategies. While this stimulates consumer spending, it raises concerns about potential revenue shortfalls for states and raises the risk of increased tax avoidance.

• Operational Challenges and Public Confidence

  • The IRS’s staffing shortages threaten enforcement efforts and timely processing, risking refund delays, backlogs, and public dissatisfaction. Such issues could erode trust in the tax system and encourage non-compliance, further jeopardizing future revenue streams.

• Shifting Wealth Transfer Policies

  • Several states are raising estate and inheritance thresholds or eliminating certain taxes, prompting a shift in wealth transfer planning. These changes have broader social equity implications, influencing intergenerational wealth dynamics and public policy debates.

Current Status and Future Outlook

Looking ahead, several factors will shape the fiscal landscape:

• Legal and Judicial Outcomes
  Court decisions—such as Montana’s property valuation litigation and California’s wealth tax review—will be pivotal in determining policy directions and revenue forecasts.

• Federal Policy Evolution
  Continued updates on clean energy incentives, depreciation rules, and industry-specific credits will influence state conformity choices, investment patterns, and industry planning.

• Operational Capacity Improvements
  Addressing the IRS’s staffing shortages and modernizing enforcement efforts will be essential to maintaining compliance, protecting revenue, and restoring taxpayer trust.

---

In summary, U.S. states are engaged in a complex balancing act—pursuing transformative tax reforms amid an environment rife with legal uncertainties, federal policy shifts, and operational constraints. The upcoming months will be critical in assessing whether these reforms will achieve their intended goals or generate unintended consequences. Success will hinge on strategic legal, fiscal, and operational responses to navigate this evolving landscape and foster a stable, equitable fiscal future for all Americans.