Moves to define token securities and jurisdiction for crypto

Crypto Regulatory Clarity Push

Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Clarifying Token Securities, Jurisdiction, and Cross-Technology Governance in Crypto and AI

As the digital economy accelerates, the imperative for precise, transparent regulation of innovative technologies—including cryptocurrencies, tokens, stablecoins, and artificial intelligence (AI)—has become more urgent than ever. Governments, international organizations, and industry stakeholders are actively working to establish frameworks that foster innovation while safeguarding investors, ensuring legal certainty, and upholding ethical standards. Recent developments reveal a sophisticated push toward defining token classifications, clarifying jurisdictional responsibilities, and integrating governance models—especially as the boundaries between blockchain, stablecoins, and AI systems grow increasingly intertwined.

This dynamic regulatory environment underscores the critical importance of clarity to support sustainable growth, resilience, and responsible deployment of these transformative technologies.

U.S. Efforts to Clarify Token Securities and Jurisdictional Boundaries

The SEC’s Refined Approach to Token Classification

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) remains at the forefront of efforts to delineate what constitutes a security within the crypto space. Building upon the foundational Howey Test, established in 1946, the SEC is actively refining its criteria to better address modern blockchain assets:

Enhanced Assessment Factors: Recent initiatives consider levels of decentralization, utility functions, issuance methods, and issuer control to more accurately determine security status.
Adapting the Howey Test: Recognizing technological realities, regulators are working to incorporate new frameworks that prevent overly broad securities classifications which could stifle innovation.
Increased Enforcement: The SEC has intensified enforcement actions against tokens operating in legal gray zones, signaling a strategic move to reduce ambiguity and promote compliance.

These efforts aim to provide clear standards for token issuers, reducing legal uncertainty and establishing pathways for responsible innovation.

Legislative Initiatives: The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act

Parallel to SEC guidance, legislative proposals such as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act are gaining bipartisan support. The legislation seeks to:

Explicitly delineate jurisdiction: Clarify whether certain tokens fall under SEC or CFTC oversight.
Reduce Regulatory Overlap: Minimize conflicting obligations that could hinder technological progress.
Simplify Compliance: Provide clearer pathways for blockchain projects to operate within the legal framework.
Create a predictable environment: Encourage investment and responsible development by stabilizing legal expectations.

By defining jurisdictional boundaries, the Act aims to stabilize the legal landscape, enabling market participants to innovate confidently.

Formal Rulemaking and Regulatory Guidance

Recent filings and notices in the Federal Register indicate ongoing rulemaking processes that will:

Set standards for token issuance, reporting, and compliance.
Establish transaction reporting obligations.
Implement enforcement mechanisms to protect investors and uphold market integrity.

Legal experts and industry stakeholders are closely monitoring these developments, as formalized rules will bring much-needed clarity and contribute to a more predictable, fair, and resilient market ecosystem.

Expanded Oversight of Stablecoins and Institutional Crypto

While initial focus centered on classifying tokens, recent signals point toward more comprehensive regulation of stablecoins, especially concerning custody, issuance, and systemic risk management:

Stablecoins as Securities: There is an increasing debate on whether certain stablecoins could be classified as securities, particularly if they resemble investment contracts or are used as investment vehicles.
Custody Standards: Regulators are emphasizing robust custody standards to mitigate systemic risks, especially for stablecoin issuers operating at institutional levels.
Regulatory Obligations: New rules may require issuers, traders, and holders—both retail and institutional—to adhere to stricter compliance protocols, including enhanced transparency and risk management.

This evolution indicates a move toward integrating stablecoins fully into the financial system, with an emphasis on systemic stability and consumer protection.

Cross-Border and Cross-Technology Governance: International Harmonization Accelerates

Global Coordination in AI and Blockchain Regulation

Recognizing the interconnectedness of AI and blockchain, regulators worldwide are pursuing harmonized standards to prevent fragmentation and facilitate interoperability:

The EU AI Act, which officially entered into force on August 1, 2024, exemplifies this trend by emphasizing risk assessments, transparency, and accountability for AI applications.
Italy’s Law No. 132 (effective from October 10, 2025) underscores the importance of regulatory clarity for AI deployment.
Recent EU guidance on AI-generated imagery highlights regulatory concerns around privacy and intellectual property rights.

European bodies such as the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) have issued reports emphasizing:

The necessity of comprehensive risk assessments.
The importance of transparency and accountability.
The role of data privacy controls, including anonymization and pseudonymization, to balance AI innovation with individual rights.

Governance Frameworks and Data Privacy Controls

Organizations are adopting structured governance models to deploy AI responsibly. For example, the Australian 3-Layer AI Governance Framework includes:

Policy Layer: Establishes overarching principles.
Operational Layer: Implements risk assessments, controls, and monitoring.
Legal Layer: Ensures compliance with GDPR, UK GDPR, and other privacy laws.

Practical guidance—such as "How to Configure Sensitivity Labels" in tools like Microsoft Purview—assist organizations in protecting sensitive data within AI systems like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini. These controls are vital to maintain data security and respect privacy rights while leveraging AI.

International Cooperation and Standardization

The convergence of AI and blockchain regulation underscores the need for global cooperation to:

Prevent regulatory fragmentation.
Enable interoperability across jurisdictions.
Support cross-border data flows.
Develop common risk assessment methodologies.

These efforts aim to foster harmonized innovation and global standards that support responsible technological advancement.

Recent Incidents, Emerging Risks, and Governance Challenges

Data Provenance, Intellectual Property, and Training Data Risks

Recent events have highlighted training data provenance issues:

Microsoft withdrew a developer tutorial after it went viral, revealing it was trained on pirated Harry Potter books, raising IP rights concerns and data legality questions.
European Parliament notices have begun addressing these concerns, including a recent full content report describing Meta's plans to train AI systems using proprietary and potentially unauthorized data sources. The European Parliament expressed serious apprehensions about Meta's approach, emphasizing the need for clear licensing and transparency in training data sourcing.

Government Use of Commercial AI and Transparency Concerns

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) plans to utilize Google's AI for drafting new regulations, exemplifying increased reliance on commercial AI tools. While promising for efficiency, this raises transparency and accountability concerns:

How AI influences policymaking.
The accuracy and bias mitigation of AI-generated outputs.
Ethical considerations surrounding automated regulatory drafting.

Surveillance, Privacy, and National Security Tensions

State-level initiatives are underway to limit law enforcement access to surveillance data:

Proposed restrictions on License Plate Reader (LPR) data aim to protect privacy rights.
Tensions persist over AI’s potential weaponization and national security, with reports indicating pressure on companies like Anthropic to drop restrictions on military applications in exchange for Pentagon contracts.

Practical Recommendations for Stakeholders

Organizations navigating this evolving landscape should prioritize layered governance frameworks:

Implement sensitivity labeling and risk recognition practices.
Ensure cross-border compliance with standards like GDPR and Data Act.
Engage proactively with policymakers to influence and adapt to regulatory changes.
Develop training programs—such as those highlighted by Jared Browne—to enhance privacy and AI governance awareness.

Staying informed through resources like "GDPR International Data Transfers" and "What is the EU AI Act" will be vital for maintaining compliance and ethical standards.

Current Status and Future Outlook

The global movement toward clarifying token classifications, defining jurisdictional boundaries, and strengthening cross-technology governance is shaping a more responsible and innovative digital ecosystem. The main goals include:

Providing clear pathways for compliance.
Enabling regulators to target enforcement effectively.
Promoting decentralization as a resilience strategy.
Ensuring AI and blockchain systems adhere to robust governance and privacy standards.

Legislative actions, regulatory guidance, and international cooperation continue to refine these frameworks, indicating a future where harmonized standards foster sustainable innovation while safeguarding public interests. Agencies like the SEC, CFTC, and European regulators are actively shaping policies that will influence the global digital economy.

Notable New Articles and Guidance

The European Parliament recently issued a notice raising concerns about Meta's AI training plans involving proprietary data, emphasizing the importance of transparency and licensing.
The U.S. State Department has urged diplomats to lobby against foreign data sovereignty laws to preserve cross-border data flows vital for global commerce.
Emerging AI hiring laws across jurisdictions mandate transparency and fairness in automated employment decisions, prompting organizations to align policies proactively.
Georgia’s Attorney General continues legal efforts to maintain law enforcement access to license plate data, highlighting ongoing tensions between public safety and privacy rights.

Implications and Concluding Remarks

The expanding regulatory landscape reflects a global movement toward more precise, transparent, and balanced regulation of emerging digital technologies. The overarching goal is to enable responsible innovation, protect rights, and promote interoperability across regions and sectors.

As agencies like the SEC, CFTC, and European authorities refine their frameworks, stakeholder engagement, continuous monitoring, and adaptive governance will be crucial. The future points toward a harmonized, resilient digital ecosystem—supporting sustainable growth in both crypto and AI domains, while safeguarding public trust and ethical standards.

In sum, these developments mark a significant step toward a more secure, transparent, and globally integrated digital future, setting the stage for ongoing innovation driven by clarity, cooperation, and responsible governance.

Sources (27)