EU ETS, CBAM, and evolving global carbon market design and industry impacts

Carbon Pricing, ETS Reform & CBAM

The global carbon market landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with the European Union’s carbon pricing reforms and border adjustment mechanisms at the forefront of a complex interplay between climate ambition, industrial competitiveness, and international trade. Recent developments in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), coupled with emerging global carbon market frameworks and growing operational constraints on the energy transition, are reshaping how industries and policymakers approach decarbonization strategies.

Strengthening the EU ETS and CBAM Amid Heightened Industry Challenges

The EU ETS remains the backbone of Europe’s climate policy, incentivizing emissions reductions by setting a carbon price across power generation, heavy industry, and aviation. However, as the system matures and carbon prices settle around €65–75 per ton of CO₂ (late 2025 data), the European Commission is pushing forward with significant reforms to ensure the ETS remains effective and equitable.

Recalibrating Free Allowances: In an effort to strike a better balance between climate ambition and industrial competitiveness, Brussels is actively reviewing the framework governing free carbon allowances. Internal EU documents reveal three primary options under consideration:
- A phased reduction of free allowances over the next decade.
- Sector-specific benchmark recalibrations that more accurately reflect actual emission intensities.
- Possible transitional mechanisms to mitigate abrupt cost spikes for vulnerable industries.
This overhaul aims to tighten incentives for emission reductions without triggering carbon leakage—where companies relocate operations outside the EU to evade carbon costs.
Sectoral Impact Spotlight: Energy-intensive sectors like steel, cement, and chemicals are at the epicenter of these reforms. For example, Tata Steel Ltd. has publicly acknowledged the dual-edged nature of CBAM — which it regards as both an “equalisation tax” that levels the playing field and a significant new cost burden depending on how carbon costs are internalized in supply chains. As the EU ETS phase-in continues, these sectors face mounting compliance costs and strategic decisions around investment in low-carbon technologies.
CBAM’s Expanding Role: The operational rollout of CBAM is transforming trade dynamics by imposing a carbon price on imports of key commodities (steel, cement, aluminum, fertilizers). This mechanism complements the EU ETS by preventing carbon leakage and encouraging cleaner production worldwide. It has triggered responses from exporting countries and multinational corporations, who are increasingly investing in carbon accounting, certification, and cleaner supply chains to maintain access to the EU market.
Industry Pushback and Calls for Stability: Europe’s largest business lobby has urged policymakers to carefully phase reforms, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining free allowances for longer to safeguard competitiveness. Industry voices highlight the critical need for regulatory certainty to underpin long-term investments in emissions reduction technologies.

Global Carbon Market Mechanisms and Enhanced Corporate Reporting

Beyond Europe, the international carbon market architecture is gaining momentum, driven by the operationalization of UN Article 6 and the establishment of robust sustainability disclosure frameworks.

UN Article 6 Operationalization in 2026: This landmark implementation will enable international carbon credit trading, fostering cooperation between countries and scaling blended finance models that combine public, private, and philanthropic capital. The result is expected to accelerate investments in sustainable infrastructure and climate technologies, particularly in emerging economies.
Advancements in Reporting Standards: The rollout of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (S1 & S2) and updates to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol — notably regarding natural carbon sink accounting — are providing companies with more credible, transparent, and comparable tools for net-zero reporting. These frameworks respond to increasing investor and regulator demands for accountability and provide a foundation for consistent carbon credit valuation.
Carbon Market Buyer Guidance: Publications like the 2026 Carbon Market Buyer’s Guide by South Pole are proving essential for companies navigating varied carbon pricing instruments, including ETS, carbon taxes, and voluntary markets. This guidance demystifies complex compliance landscapes and supports strategic portfolio optimization.

Industry Adaptation: Supply Chain Shifts, Low-Carbon Inputs, and Technological Innovations

Corporations are actively adjusting their operational and supply chain strategies to manage escalating carbon costs and regulatory complexity.

Supply Chain Realignments: Exporters to the EU, especially in carbon-intensive industries, are revising sourcing strategies and investing in cleaner production technologies to mitigate CBAM impacts. Carbon accounting and certification are becoming prerequisites for market access.
Low-Carbon Inputs and Circular Economy: Firms increasingly incorporate biochar, recycled content, and other sustainable materials to lower carbon footprints. These inputs reduce reliance on fossil-based raw materials and offer compliance cost advantages under EU ETS and CBAM.
Technological and Operational Measures: Maritime transport, now fully under the EU ETS, is adopting engine optimization techniques to curb emissions and reduce compliance costs. Similarly, AI-enabled carbon accounting platforms and blockchain technologies are enhancing traceability and transparency in emissions reporting.

Emerging Constraints: Hardware Bottlenecks and Their Impact on the Energy Transition

A recent and critical development affecting the pace of decarbonization is the emergence of a hardware bottleneck in the global energy transition.

Supercycle Demand for Grid Infrastructure: According to Bruno Melles, managing director at a leading energy infrastructure firm, demand for transformers, substations, and grid connections is in a “supercycle,” driven by the rapid deployment of renewable energy and electrification technologies. This surge is causing supply chain pressures and delivery delays.
Implications for Carbon Markets and Emissions Trajectories: These bottlenecks risk slowing the deployment of low-carbon technologies such as wind, solar, and electrolysers for green hydrogen. Delays in grid expansion and hardware availability could prolong reliance on fossil fuels, complicate emissions trajectories, and create volatility in carbon prices as regulatory targets become more challenging to meet.

Trade and Policy Frontiers: Shipping Emissions and International Competitiveness

The EU’s full integration of shipping emissions into the ETS marks a significant policy frontier, with global repercussions.

Shipping Emissions Regulation and Operational Responses: The EU ETS now covers maritime transport emissions, prompting shipping companies to adopt operational efficiencies such as engine optimization. These measures are vital for managing rising carbon costs.
International Debates on Universal Shipping Levies: Pacific Island nations and other stakeholders are advocating for a global levy on shipping emissions to ensure a level playing field and support climate resilience. Such proposals could reshape carbon cost structures and competitiveness in maritime logistics, with knock-on effects for sectors like green ammonia transport.
Broader Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage Concerns: As carbon pricing mechanisms proliferate globally, industries and governments are closely monitoring potential trade distortions. The interplay between EU policies and international frameworks will be pivotal in shaping future carbon leakage risks and industrial relocation patterns.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complex Carbon Market Ecosystem

The evolving EU ETS reforms and CBAM implementation, situated within a rapidly expanding global carbon market framework, underscore the intricate balance between ambitious climate targets and industrial/economic realities. Simultaneously, hardware bottlenecks in energy infrastructure and emerging policy debates on shipping emissions add new layers of complexity.

Key insights include:

The necessity of sector-specific free allowance reforms to maintain competitiveness while driving emissions reductions.
The complementary role of CBAM in leveling carbon costs and encouraging global decarbonization.
The critical importance of transparent, standardized corporate reporting and robust carbon accounting frameworks.
The strategic integration of low-carbon inputs, supply chain realignments, and technology adoption to mitigate compliance costs.
The recognition that hardware supply constraints could slow the energy transition, affecting emissions and carbon market dynamics.
The ongoing international policy dialogues around shipping emissions and trade competitiveness that will shape future carbon pricing architectures.

Achieving sustainable, competitive decarbonization will require adaptive, forward-looking strategies from policymakers, businesses, and investors alike, taking into account the multifaceted challenges and opportunities emerging within this dynamic carbon market ecosystem.

Sources (17)