JOOLA Patent Infringement Lawsuit vs 11 Foam Paddle Brands
Key Questions
What is the JOOLA ITC lawsuit about?
JOOLA has filed an ITC suit alleging patent infringement against 11 foam paddle brands including RPM Q2, Friday Aura, Diadem, and Franklin. The suit claims these paddles copy the Pro IV/V core technology using flex and spring designs. Comparisons are drawn to Gearbox GBX Gen3 versus Pro IV and RPM Q2 versus Perseus Pro V.
What new X-ray evidence relates to the lawsuit paddles?
New X-ray evidence reveals core crushing in RPM V2, Perseus IV, and Typhoon paddles. This data on durability failures is relevant to the JOOLA products under scrutiny. It highlights risks associated with Gen4/5 foam and PBCOR constructions.
What specs were measured in the RPM 14mm Q2 review?
The RPM 14mm Q2 paddle was reviewed with measured specs of 7.75oz weight, swing weight of 113, and twist weight of 6.2. This review provides concrete data in the context of the ongoing JOOLA lawsuit tracking. It is noted for boomstick-like power performance.
JOOLA ITC suit over Pro IV/V core targets RPM Q2/Friday Aura/Diadem/Franklin +7; flex/spring copies. Gearbox GBX Gen3 vs Pro IV; RPM Q2 vs Perseus Pro V; Gen4/5 foam/PBCOR risks. New: X-ray evidence of core crushing in RPM V2, Perseus IV, and Typhoon — adds durability failure data relevant to JOOLA products under scrutiny. New: RPM 14mm Q2 review with measured specs (7.75oz, SW113, TW6.2) adds concrete data to RPM Q2 tracking under lawsuit context.