Wildlife Conservation Hub

ESA 'Harm' Definition Rollback and Legal Challenges

ESA 'Harm' Definition Rollback and Legal Challenges

Trump administration rescinds 'harm' from ESA 'take' definition, gutting habitat protections. Senators Schiff and Whitehouse introduce resolution to counter. Montana wildlife advocates file lawsuit targeting grizzlies, bull trout, and whitebark pine. Oregon Zoo director publishes op-ed defending ESA. Courts may weigh in under Loper Bright. High-stakes policy fight with major implications for species and habitat protection.

Sources (2)
Updated Aug 4, 2026