Gender-Based Violence and Caste: Twisha Sharma and Siya Goel Cases
Key Questions
How do caste structures affect responses to gender-based violence?
Brahmanical patriarchy and caste invalidate women's consent and lead to selective public grief that favors upper-caste victims. Violence against Dalit, Adivasi, and Muslim women is often normalized.
What do the Twisha Sharma and Siya Goel cases illustrate?
These cases show how women's 'no' is systematically disregarded in gender-based violence incidents. They expose intersections of caste discrimination and patriarchal control.
What role does feminist critique play in analyzing these incidents?
Feminist critiques emphasize how caste and gender hierarchies reproduce social control through violence. They call for recognizing all victims equally regardless of background.
How is consent impacted by caste in these contexts?
Consent is frequently overridden or dismissed when caste hierarchies privilege certain groups. This leads to unequal justice and societal indifference to marginalized women's experiences.
What broader pattern emerges from these gender violence cases?
The cases reveal how gender-based violence serves as a tool for maintaining caste and patriarchal order. Public responses often reflect and reinforce existing social inequalities.
Feminist critiques highlight how Brahmanical patriarchy and caste structures invalidate women's consent. The Twisha Sharma case and Siya Goel murder case expose how women's 'no' is systematically disregarded, with selective public grief privileging upper-caste women while normalizing violence against Dalit, Adivasi, and Muslim women. These cases underscore the intersection of gender-based violence and caste discrimination.