Escalating semiconductor and AI competition, export‑control tug‑of‑war, and strategic mineral/supply‑chain contestation

China–West Chip, AI & Resource Rivalry

The semiconductor and artificial intelligence (AI) competition between China and the West has entered an intensified and more complex phase in 2028, shaped by escalating technological innovations, evolving export-control frameworks, and a broader strategic contest that now spans space, critical minerals, and digital-financial infrastructure. Recent developments underscore how both sides are adapting to multifaceted constraints and opportunities, revealing new battlegrounds and deepening the stakes for global technological leadership and geopolitical stability.

U.S. Export-Control Challenges Drive Multilateral Cooperation and Legislative Innovation

The U.S. continues to confront significant legal and political constraints in enforcing export controls, particularly following the 2028 Supreme Court ruling limiting executive tariff and export-control authority without explicit Congressional backing. This ruling, combined with domestic political pressures—especially from constituencies like farming lobbies affected by $175 billion in Chinese retaliatory tariffs—has slowed Washington’s unilateral responsiveness.

Export-control agility remains hamstrung, with U.S. agencies unable to rapidly update or impose restrictions, creating exploitable enforcement gaps.
In response, the Biden administration is intensifying reliance on multilateral export-control frameworks involving the G7, Quad, and AUKUS alliances, seeking collective pressure on China’s semiconductor and AI industries.
The recently enacted CHARGE Act aims to broaden regulatory oversight to emerging technologies, including AI software and next-generation semiconductors; however, its effectiveness is still limited by legal ambiguities that delay nimble enforcement.
As highlighted in strategic discussions, Washington’s challenge is not only technical but also political, requiring coordinated legislative and diplomatic efforts to sustain allied cohesion and export-control rigor.

China's Sophisticated Circumvention Undermines Embargoes, Elevates Software Leakage Risks

China’s circumvention tactics have grown markedly more sophisticated, moving beyond hardware procurement to software-level intellectual property (IP) leakage and AI model replication:

The recent public accusations by Anthropic against three Chinese AI firms for “distilling” its Claude AI model underscore the difficulty of policing software IP theft. Model distillation enables Chinese firms to replicate cutting-edge AI functionalities without direct hardware transfers, circumventing hardware-focused embargoes.
The AI startup DeepSeek openly admitted to operating embargoed Nvidia Blackwell H200 GPUs, confirming ongoing covert procurement channels that funnel restricted high-performance AI hardware into China’s ecosystem.
Chinese manufacturers are also leveraging advanced digital intelligence technologies to improve supply-chain transparency and operational security internally, complicating Western interdiction efforts.

These developments highlight that hardware-centric export controls alone are insufficient to contain China’s rapid AI development, necessitating expanded focus on software IP protection and supply-chain intelligence.

Breakthroughs in Indigenous Semiconductor Innovation Narrow the West’s Lead

China’s push for semiconductor self-reliance is bearing fruit with notable breakthroughs that threaten to erode Western technological dominance:

SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) is reportedly advancing AI chip production capabilities despite U.S. equipment export restrictions, expanding capacity for leading-edge semiconductor nodes.
China plans a fivefold increase in advanced semiconductor production capacity over the next 1–2 years, aiming to meet surging domestic AI demands and reduce reliance on foreign fabs.
Researchers report progress in 8-nanometer (N8) transistor technology, producing chips with improved speed and energy efficiency, crucial for edge computing and cloud AI workloads.
Huawei’s unveiling of AI accelerator chips integrating particle beam lithography, ternary logic processors, and photonic CPUs signals a leap in chip design sophistication. These innovations target enhanced processing power and energy efficiency, supporting Huawei’s broader massive 6G patent strategy, which aims to extend its technological footprint globally.

This indigenous innovation trajectory enables China to circumvent some export controls by scaling domestic manufacturing and advancing novel chip architectures.

Militarization of Space Adds a New Strategic Dimension to Semiconductor and AI Rivalry

The integration of semiconductor and AI capabilities into space militarization programs significantly escalates strategic competition:

The classified fourth mission of China’s “Divine Dragon” spaceplane has generated speculation regarding its role in military reconnaissance and orbital AI computation, projecting Chinese AI capabilities beyond terrestrial export controls.
The “Three-Body” orbital AI compute constellation serves as a space-based data center hosting AI compute resources, granting China computational sovereignty and strategic leverage in space.
These developments complicate traditional arms control frameworks and raise the risk of strategic instability as space becomes a contested domain for AI-enabled military operations.
In response, regional allies are enhancing defense postures: Japan plans to deploy surface-to-air missiles on a remote island near Taiwan, and the U.S. has bolstered missile defenses in Northern Luzon, Philippines, aiming to deter Chinese military actions in the Taiwan Strait and Indo-Pacific.

Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry Under Intensifying Security and Market Pressures

Taiwan’s semiconductor ecosystem remains the linchpin of the global tech supply chain but faces mounting geopolitical risks:

Taiwanese semiconductor stock indices have experienced a severe drop of up to 44%, fueled by fears of Chinese military escalation and potential supply-chain disruptions.
China continues to increase military pressure through intensified fighter jet incursions and naval maneuvers, accompanied by stern diplomatic warnings from Foreign Minister Wang Yi.
The U.S. and allied partners have doubled down on commitments to Taiwan’s security, emphasizing the catastrophic global impact of any disruption to Taiwan’s semiconductor fabs.
Major tech firms, including Apple, are accelerating friend-shoring initiatives, relocating production and assembly to politically stable regions such as Southeast Asia and Mexico to mitigate supply-chain risks.

Taiwan’s semiconductor industry sits at a precarious geopolitical crossroads, with allied deterrence and contingency planning more urgent than ever.

Strategic Mineral Competition and Supply-Chain Realignment Accelerate

Competition over critical minerals—essential for semiconductor and AI hardware production—has intensified, reshaping global supply chains:

Indonesia’s recent tightening of nickel export restrictions has disrupted China’s dominant nickel processing, prompting the U.S. and allies to aggressively diversify mineral sourcing.
A landmark India-Brazil partnership aims to reduce dependence on China’s near-monopoly over rare earth elements, signaling the emergence of new strategic resource blocs beyond established supply chains.
China continues to deepen influence across Africa through zero-tariff trade agreements covering 53 countries and infrastructure investments securing critical minerals and space infrastructure footholds.
In a sharp escalation, China imposed export restrictions on 40 Japanese companies producing dual-use goods tied to semiconductor and AI sectors, illustrating rising tensions with key allied nations.
Western democracies are investing heavily in friend-shoring mineral processing and semiconductor manufacturing in stable regions like Southeast Asia, Mexico, and Morocco. Projects such as Critical Metals’ “N4” rare earth mine exemplify efforts to pivot away from China-centric supply chains.
Chinese electric vehicle giants BYD and Geely are expanding production in Mexico to hedge geopolitical risks and leverage friend-shoring, while the U.S. advances mineral extraction projects in Guinea to counterbalance China’s resource dominance.

These dynamics are transforming resource competition into a geopolitical fault line with profound consequences for global technology ecosystems.

Digital and Financial Infrastructure Emerge as New Battlegrounds

Beyond hardware, control over digital infrastructure and financial systems has become a critical frontier in the tech rivalry:

China is expanding investments in subsea cables across the South China Sea and beyond, enhancing digital connectivity while raising concerns over potential disruptions to adversaries’ communications.
The U.S. and allies have responded with visa restrictions on Chinese-linked personnel and exclusions of Chinese firms from critical infrastructure projects to protect digital supply chains.
The digital yuan’s internationalization is advancing rapidly, now operational in over 185 countries and integrated into the BRICS payment system. Hong Kong’s 2026–27 budget emphasizes offshore yuan financial products and stablecoin regulation, deepening financial links with partners such as the UAE.
The USD/CNY exchange rate remains tightly managed near 6.94, reflecting China's controlled monetary policy amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

These trends underscore the multi-dimensional nature of the tech rivalry, extending into cyber, financial, and digital infrastructure domains.

Economic and Diplomatic Impacts Shape Allied Export-Control Cohesion

The escalating contest exerts significant effects on allied economies, firms, and diplomatic engagements:

U.S. export bans on Nvidia GPUs since mid-2027 have blocked shipments exceeding $7.4 billion, with Taiwan’s export controls contributing to a 22.7% year-over-year decline in semiconductor imports to China.
The European Union has tightened restrictions on Chinese researchers and excluded Chinese firms from critical programs, signaling allied regulatory alignment.
The U.S. revoked visas of Chilean officials linked to China-backed submarine cable projects amid concerns over digital infrastructure security.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s recent visit to China to discuss trade and security signals the nuanced diplomatic balancing act amid rising tensions.
Quarterly guidance from Electronic Design Automation (EDA) and Intellectual Property (IP) vendors such as Synopsys reveals cautious outlooks tied to supply-chain uncertainties and export-control impacts.

These factors highlight the intricate interplay of economic, diplomatic, and regulatory forces shaping allied responses to China’s technological ascent.

Emerging Watchpoints and Future Trajectories

The pace and global impact of China’s N8 transistor breakthroughs and particle beam lithography techniques will be critical indicators of the narrowing technology gap.
The operational status and strategic deployment of the “Three-Body” orbital AI compute constellation and “Divine Dragon” spaceplane remain key to assessing space-based AI militarization risks.
The scale and sophistication of Chinese firms’ use of embargoed Nvidia GPUs and AI model distillation will determine the effectiveness of export controls.
Monitoring Huawei’s AI chip manufacturing capacity and innovation trajectory, especially in light of its expansive 6G patent strategy, will inform competitive dynamics.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry stability amid ongoing Chinese military pressure and allied deterrence efforts will remain a critical geopolitical bellwether.
The geopolitical consequences of Indonesia’s nickel export restrictions and the India-Brazil rare earth partnership will influence global resource supply chains.
The escalation of AI-enabled military technologies and allied intelligence countermeasures will shape future conflict dynamics.
The trajectory of digital yuan internationalization and offshore financial product development will impact global financial architecture.
Legal and political developments influencing U.S. export-control enforcement and allied trade coherence will determine the durability of multilateral pressure on China.
Geopolitical risks surrounding subsea cable infrastructure and digital supply-chain security merit close attention given their strategic implications.

Conclusion

The semiconductor and AI rivalry between China and the West remains the defining strategic contest of the 21st century’s technological landscape. While U.S. export-control enforcement is constrained by legal and political hurdles, China’s rapid indigenous innovation, sophisticated embargo circumvention strategies, and militarization of space-based AI infrastructure are fundamentally reshaping the global technological and geopolitical order.

Taiwan’s semiconductor industry sits at a fragile nexus of security threats and market volatility, with allied friend-shoring and deterrence efforts critical to averting disruption. Meanwhile, intensifying competition over critical minerals, digital infrastructure, and financial systems further complicates the challenge of maintaining resilient, secure, and diversified supply chains.

Navigating this intricate and evolving contest demands sophisticated, coordinated strategies—blending export controls, multilateral diplomacy, supply-chain diversification, innovation ecosystems, and robust intelligence cooperation. The ongoing bifurcation of AI ecosystems, combined with the militarization of dual-use space technologies and intensifying resource competition, underscores the imperative for alliance cohesion, pragmatic engagement, and comprehensive risk management to safeguard global technological leadership and strategic stability well into the coming decade.

Sources (263)