Europe’s struggle for strategic autonomy amid US–China rivalry, Russia, and institutional limits

Europe’s pursuit of strategic autonomy in 2026 remains a formidable challenge amid intensifying global rivalries, internal fragmentation, and unpredictable geopolitical shifts. The enduring war in Ukraine, deepening transatlantic rifts, China’s expanding influence alongside internal military purges, and volatile Middle Eastern diplomacy—particularly the US–Iran nuclear talks—continue to constrain Europe’s ability to act independently on the world stage. Recent developments in domestic European politics, such as Denmark’s snap election and rising Scottish nationalism, further underscore the internal dynamics complicating Europe’s strategic coherence.

---

Ukraine Conflict: Western Divisions Further Undermine Europe’s Diplomatic Leverage

As the war in Ukraine passes its fifth year, Europe’s capacity to shape a peaceful resolution remains severely limited by fragmentation within the Western alliance.

• The February 2026 UN Security Council briefing painted a grim picture of humanitarian suffering and the risk of broader regional destabilization, with calls for “every diplomatic tool” to end hostilities.
• The UN General Assembly’s landmark resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire was notably weakened by the United States’ unexpected abstention, exposing fissures within the transatlantic coalition and diluting Europe’s diplomatic influence.
• EU diplomats, including Ambassador Christina Markus Lassen, emphasize a pragmatic approach that balances unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty with acknowledgment of entrenched territorial disputes obstructing negotiations.
• Persistent disagreements over the use of frozen Russian assets for Ukraine’s reconstruction reveal deeper economic and political cleavages within the EU, impeding a unified response.
• Diplomatic efforts in Geneva and informal channels remain deadlocked, with Moscow and Kyiv each refusing to budge on core territorial claims, prolonging the conflict stalemate.

These factors highlight Europe’s limited independent leverage and the difficulty of maintaining strategic autonomy amid external pressures and internal divisions.

---

China’s Dual Challenge: Expanding Influence and Military Purges

China’s growing diplomatic footprint and internal military shake-ups add layers of complexity to Europe’s strategic environment.

• President Xi Jinping’s intensified outreach across Asia, Africa, and Latin America exerts pressure on Europe to accelerate diversification away from Chinese supply chains, especially for critical green technology components.
• The India-EU Comprehensive Trade and Strategic Partnership Agreement (C-TSPA) has become increasingly vital as Europe seeks alternative economic and strategic partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
• A recent think tank report documenting extensive purges within the People’s Liberation Army (PLA)—including the removal of senior officers—raises questions about China’s near-term military capabilities and strategic intentions.
• The US Supreme Court’s affirmation of tariffs on Chinese imports further complicates transatlantic trade dynamics, forcing Europe to navigate between alignment with US protectionist policies and the preservation of open markets.

Europe must therefore balance engagement with China’s expanding influence against safeguarding its strategic autonomy amid these unpredictable shifts.

---

Deepening Transatlantic Rift on Legal and Military Fronts

The transatlantic alliance faces growing strains over legal jurisdiction and military cooperation, challenging Europe’s strategic independence.

• French President Emmanuel Macron’s appeals to lift unilateral US sanctions targeting European officials reflect mounting European frustration with Washington’s punitive measures that hinder legal and diplomatic collaboration.
• The US Senate’s ongoing efforts to exempt American personnel from International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction exacerbate tensions and undermine global justice mechanisms.
• An ICC judge’s description of US sanctions as causing “civil death” in Europe powerfully illustrates the institutional rifts eroding cooperation.
• Militarily, while the expanded deployment of US air operations at Portugal’s Lajes base enhances NATO’s Atlantic defense, it also underscores Europe’s persistent dependence on US military infrastructure.
• These dynamics fuel European demands for accelerated defense integration and autonomous military capabilities to reduce reliance on Washington.

---

Hybrid Threats and Cryptocurrency-Enabled Sanctions Evasion Undermine European Resilience

Europe faces a sophisticated and evolving hybrid threat environment that challenges democratic institutions, sanctions enforcement, and societal cohesion.

• Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas’ warning that “wars are fought with lies and algorithms” captures the growing menace of AI-driven cognitive warfare targeting European democracies.
• The 2026 French local elections were marred by unprecedented AI-generated disinformation campaigns, including fabricated violent imagery, illustrating the weaponization of emerging technologies.
• These campaigns deepen internal EU divisions, exemplified by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s intensified opposition to EU Ukraine policies, accusing a “Kyiv-Brussels axis” of threatening Hungarian sovereignty.
• The UK’s imposition of sanctions on two Georgian TV channels accused of broadcasting Russian propaganda marks a novel step in countering foreign media influence.
• Investigations by Elliptic reveal ongoing cryptocurrency exchange facilitation of Russian sanctions evasion, prompting the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to expand countermeasures—originally targeting Iran—to also address crypto-enabled illicit finance linked to Russia.
• The EU has sanctioned eight additional Russian individuals implicated in human rights abuses, reaffirming its commitment to accountability despite enforcement difficulties.

These developments underscore the urgent need for Europe to accelerate digital sovereignty, strengthen AI governance, enhance cyber resilience, and close regulatory gaps in digital finance.

---

Economic and Legal Shocks from US Supreme Court Tariff Rulings

A pivotal US Supreme Court ruling early in 2026 has intensified political and legal uncertainties affecting transatlantic trade and European economic strategy.

• The Court decisively curtailed former President Trump’s executive authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs on Chinese imports.
• This decision sparked fierce backlash from Trump and allies advocating “fallback” tariffs as necessary tools against China’s economic practices, highlighting ongoing US trade policy volatility.
• For Europe, these judicial shifts introduce uncertainty that Brussels must deftly manage to preserve economic sovereignty and maintain trade relations with the US.
• The ruling amplifies the strategic importance of agreements like the India-EU C-TSPA as Europe seeks supply chain diversification amid US–China tensions.
• European policymakers face the delicate task of aligning with US trade frameworks while safeguarding open markets and economic autonomy.

---

Domestic Politics in Europe: Denmark’s Snap Election and Scottish Nationalism Highlight Internal Fragmentation

Recent developments in European domestic politics further complicate the continent’s strategic unity and transatlantic relations.

• Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called a snap parliamentary election for March 24, 2026, aiming to consolidate support for her stance resisting US pressure related to Greenland and Arctic policy issues. This reflects growing European assertiveness and occasional pushback against Washington’s strategic priorities.
• In the UK, the Scottish National Party (SNP) is poised for a majority in the upcoming election, intensifying debates over Scottish independence and EU membership prospects. Rising Scottish nationalism underscores intra-EU political fragmentation that could hamper unified European approaches to strategic challenges.
• These domestic shifts highlight the complex interplay between national politics and broader European strategic autonomy, as member states’ internal dynamics increasingly influence collective foreign and security policy cohesion.

---

Adaptive EU Diplomacy: Flexible Coalitions and Middle-Power Strategy

Faced with internal heterogeneity, the EU increasingly adopts pragmatic, flexible coalitions to sustain strategic momentum.

• A rare cross-ideological coalition in the European Parliament recently condemned repression in both Iran and Israel, demonstrating issue-specific cooperation despite political divergences.
• National positions remain fragmented—for example, Spain advocates lifting sanctions on Venezuela’s interim president, contrasting with hawkish approaches elsewhere.
• The formation of a new centrist coalition government in the Netherlands under Rob Jetten introduces fresh diplomatic dynamics.
• The EU relies on middle-power coalitions and issue-based frameworks to advance sanctions, cyber governance, and conflict mediation without requiring full unanimity.

This pragmatic diplomacy remains vital to preserving Europe’s strategic agenda amid institutional and political constraints.

---

US–Iran Geneva Talks: Continued Volatility with Energy Security Implications

The ongoing US–Iran nuclear negotiations in Geneva continue to inject uncertainty into the geopolitical environment, directly affecting European strategic planning.

• Summit talks proceed amid heightened Persian Gulf naval deployments and escalating rhetoric, seeking a revival of the 2015 nuclear deal framework.
• Despite record US crude oil inventory builds, Brent crude prices remain elevated, reflecting persistent risk premiums tied to potential deal failure or regional escalation.
• A breakthrough could alleviate Europe’s energy security concerns, while failure risks destabilizing the Middle East with spillover effects involving Russia and China.
• EU officials closely monitor the talks, recognizing their significant implications for contingency planning on energy and regional stability.

---

2026 US State of the Union: Continued Expectations for Transatlantic Burden-Sharing

The 2026 US State of the Union address reaffirmed America’s foreign policy framework linking domestic economic strength with global leadership.

• The administration emphasized a “Strong State of the Union foreign policy” grounded in economic competitiveness.
• This signals ongoing expectations for European burden-sharing and policy alignment in confronting China and Russia.
• For Europe, it underscores the imperative to fortify economic and technological foundations to sustain genuine strategic autonomy while maintaining constructive US engagement.

---

Policy Imperatives to Enhance European Strategic Autonomy

In this volatile and complex landscape, Europe must pursue a comprehensive, integrated approach:

• Deepen defense cooperation and decisively invest in autonomous military capabilities to reduce dependency on US infrastructure and ensure operational independence.
• Accelerate digital sovereignty initiatives, including robust frameworks for AI governance, misinformation countermeasures, and cybersecurity resilience.
• Expand economic diversification efforts, leveraging partnerships like the India-EU C-TSPA and broadening Indo-Pacific and African engagements to mitigate China dependency.
• Strengthen EU-wide sanctions enforcement, closing cryptocurrency regulatory gaps and enhancing cooperation with bodies like FATF.
• Leverage flexible, issue-based middle-power coalitions to overcome internal EU divisions and advance strategic priorities in diplomacy, cyber defense, and sanctions policy.
• Enhance internal resilience by countering foreign influence operations, improving consensus mechanisms, and integrating diverse member-state perspectives into coherent foreign and security policies.
• Develop contingency plans to navigate uncertainties stemming from Middle Eastern diplomacy, especially the US–Iran talks, given their direct implications for Europe’s energy security and regional stability.

---

Conclusion

Europe’s quest for strategic autonomy in 2026 unfolds amid a turbulent geopolitical landscape marked by fragmented alliances, evolving great power competitions, and complex institutional constraints. The protracted Ukraine war, widening transatlantic rifts, China’s expanding influence and internal military upheavals, rising hybrid threats, and volatile Middle Eastern diplomacy collectively limit Europe’s diplomatic and strategic freedom. Recent domestic political developments—such as Denmark’s snap election and Scottish nationalist resurgence—highlight internal fragmentation further complicating unity.

In this challenging environment, Europe’s ability to assert itself as a capable and autonomous global actor depends on pragmatic diplomacy, accelerated defense and digital sovereignty, diversified economic partnerships, and robust resilience-building. Navigating these intersecting pressures with unity and adaptability remains essential for safeguarding Europe’s strategic autonomy amid persistent geopolitical turbulence.