U.S. legislation, agency coordination, and implementation of stablecoin / market-structure rules

U.S. Stablecoin & Market Structure

U.S. Regulatory Leadership in Stablecoins and Digital Market Infrastructure: Recent Developments and Strategic Outlook

The United States remains at the forefront of establishing a comprehensive and balanced regulatory framework for stablecoins and digital asset market infrastructure. Recent legislative advances, agency initiatives, and international developments underscore a strategic push toward clarity, systemic stability, and global competitiveness amid a rapidly evolving digital economy. As other jurisdictions accelerate their efforts, the U.S. aims to shape the future of digital finance through coordinated policy actions, innovative infrastructure, and forward-looking legislation.

Key Legislative Progress: Clarifying Roles and Accelerating Institutional Participation

The Crypto Market-Structure Bill: Defining Clear Jurisdictional Boundaries

A landmark development is the Crypto Market-Structure Bill, which has made significant headway in Congress. This legislation seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulators:

The SEC will oversee securities tokens and tokenized securities, emphasizing investor protections, disclosure requirements, and compliance standards.
The CFTC will oversee commodities, derivatives, and payment stablecoins issued by regulated entities.

CFTC Chair Mike Selig expressed optimism, stating the bill is “about to become law” and emphasizing its role in creating a flexible, future-proof regulatory environment. Clear jurisdictional boundaries are vital for traditional financial institutions and blockchain innovators to operate confidently within a predictable legal framework.

The GENIUS Act: Legitimizing Stablecoins at Scale

Parallel to this, the GENIUS Act (Guaranteed Electronic and Usable Stablecoins for the United States) continues to shape the stablecoin landscape. The NCUA (National Credit Union Administration) is proposing its first formal rule to define Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers (PPSI), with the aim to:

Enable credit unions and regulated institutions to issue stablecoins at scale.
Clarify issuer responsibilities and operational standards.
Integrate stablecoins into nationwide settlement systems, fostering institutional participation.

Once finalized, these rules are expected to unlock pathways for banks and credit unions to issue stablecoins within a clear legal framework, thereby promoting market stability and systemic confidence. Industry reactions have been mixed; while many see this as a positive step toward mainstream adoption, some critics worry about potential regulatory overreach or stifling innovation.

Industry Response and Critiques

Industry groups have generally welcomed the progress but urge caution. Crypto advocates argue that overly restrictive regulations could hinder innovation, while traditional finance parties see clarity as essential for broader institutional engagement. The upcoming finalization of the NCUA’s PPSI rules could significantly accelerate large-scale, regulated stablecoin issuance, impacting liquidity and systemic stability.

Agency Coordination, Enforcement, and Prudential Measures

Relaunch of ‘Project Crypto’ and Crackdown on Illicit Stablecoin Flows

The federal government’s ‘Project Crypto’ has been relaunched, bringing together agencies such as SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, and others. Its goal is to enhance jurisdictional clarity and coordinate enforcement efforts, especially amid rising illicit activity. According to TRM Labs, illicit stablecoin transactions soared to $141 billion in 2025, setting a record high. Investigations have uncovered exchanges facilitating sanctions evasion and money laundering; notably, Garantex, which processed at least $11 billion from an office in the same building as its operations.

Prudential Reforms and Risk Management

In response to these risks, regulators and industry leaders emphasize the need to revise Basel risk weights, arguing that current capital standards underestimate stablecoin risks. Updating these prudential standards could:

Encourage prudent engagement by banks.
Enhance systemic stability by aligning capital buffers with actual risk exposures.

State-Level Regulatory Dynamics: Fragmentation Risks

At the state level, New York’s proposed CRYPTO Act signals a more aggressive regulatory stance, including stricter licensing and compliance requirements. While aimed at consumer protection and market integrity, such measures risk creating a patchwork regulatory landscape that could hinder nationwide operations and industry innovation. Similarly, legislation targeting crypto kiosks in states like West Virginia aims to reduce fraud and protect consumers.

Meanwhile, internationally, the UK’s stablecoin caps have raised concerns; Coinbase’s CEO warns that strict holdings limits could push liquidity offshore, undermining the UK’s competitive position in digital finance.

Industry Infrastructure and Consumer Payment Rails

Supporting Digital Payments and Mainstream Adoption

Major players are actively developing infrastructure to support stablecoin use:

Visa and Mastercard now facilitate USDC transactions, with annual transaction volumes exceeding $1.7 trillion, demonstrating widespread trust.
MetaMask, in partnership with Mastercard, has launched a crypto payment card in the US, enabling consumers to spend self-custodied crypto directly at retail outlets.
Monavate and OKX are collaborating on payment cards linked to stablecoins, further bridging digital assets and everyday commerce.
Fiserv has introduced a real-time cash-settlement platform tailored for digital asset firms, signaling a move toward faster, lower-cost transactions and mainstream integration.

Furthermore, TP ICAP is restructuring its Fusion Digital Assets platform to incorporate matched principal trading, aiming to improve liquidity, transparency, and market depth—all essential for fostering institutional confidence.

International Tokenization and Digital Bond Initiatives

Hong Kong’s Digital Bond Platform

Hong Kong is accelerating its efforts to build a digital bond platform, integrating tokenized bond settlement into its post-trade systems. This initiative aims to streamline issuance, settlement, and liquidity of digital bonds, positioning Hong Kong as a regional leader in digital capital markets.

Global Competitiveness and Regulatory Frameworks Abroad

Other jurisdictions, including Singapore, UAE, and Europe, are expanding their licensed stablecoin activities. The EU’s MiCA regulation and digital euro pilot scheduled for 2027 are designed to foster innovation while protecting investors. Germany’s Bundesbank emphasizes the importance of stablecoins pegged to the euro in preserving monetary sovereignty.

These international developments heighten the urgency for the U.S. to accelerate its regulatory efforts. Falling behind could jeopardize leadership in global digital finance.

Recent Regulatory Signaling and Industry Engagement

Public Discussions and Industry Lobbying

At ETHDenver 2026, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins and Commissioner Hester Peirce reinforced the need for regulatory clarity that protects investors while supporting innovation. The SEC’s public stance indicates a willingness to regulate prudently, but emphasizes the importance of clear standards that are adaptable to technological change.

Industry groups are actively lobbying for flexible, technology-neutral regulation to ensure policy frameworks can evolve alongside innovation.

Market Outlook & Strategic Implications

Growth Projections and Institutional Adoption

According to Standard Chartered, the stablecoin market could reach $2 trillion by 2028, with additional demand for U.S. Treasuries estimated at $0.8–1.0 trillion. This indicates that stablecoins are poised to:

Become a primary form of digital liquidity.
Influence Treasury issuance and demand.
Reinforce the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency.

Major Firms’ Strategic Moves

The SEC’s evolving custody and broker-dealer regulations are prompting institutions to rethink custody strategies, emphasizing safety and compliance.
Binance, under CEO CZ, is actively pursuing bank charters to operate within U.S. regulations, aiming to expand market share and introduce innovative products domestically.

Opportunities and Risks

One notable development is the MetaMask and Mastercard partnership, which has launched a nationwide crypto payment card in the US. This integration allows users to spend self-custodied crypto seamlessly, signaling a significant step toward mass-market acceptance.

Meanwhile, the AllUnity joint venture has launched a regulated CHF stablecoin for institutional investors, exemplifying the trend towards regulated, cross-border stablecoins that cater to sophisticated market participants.

However, regulatory fragmentation—exacerbated by aggressive state-level measures like New York’s CRYPTO Act—poses a threat to industry cohesion and market stability. Coordinated, timely policy action is essential to avoid undermining U.S. leadership in this space.

Current Status and Strategic Implications

The U.S. is on a promising trajectory toward building a resilient, innovative, and secure digital asset ecosystem. The upcoming months are critical for translating legislative and regulatory initiatives into practical frameworks that support a multi-trillion-dollar stablecoin market, institutional adoption, and systemic stability.

International competition is intensifying; jurisdictions like Hong Kong, Singapore, and the EU are making significant strides in digital bond markets, stablecoin regulation, and tokenization infrastructure. To maintain its leadership, the U.S. must accelerate legislative processes, enhance inter-agency coordination, and implement prudential standards aligned with actual risks.

In conclusion, the strategic focus must be on timely, harmonized regulation that balances innovation and stability, ensuring the U.S. remains a global leader in digital finance amid mounting international competition.

Sources (49)