Operational AI governance gaps for Copilot/M365
Key Questions
What risks does AB-730 address for Copilot?
AB-730 focuses on responsible AI for Copilot, tackling fabrications, data injection risks, and agent-related issues. It provides checklists to stop AI lies and mitigate data risks. The session (5:51 YouTube) equips users with mastery tools.
How does Microsoft Purview support AI governance?
Purview ensures data security and governance in the AI age, covering risks like fabrications and injections. It integrates with Copilot/M365 for compliance amid scaling agents. Videos demonstrate its role in Zero Trust frameworks.
What governance gaps exist in operational AI for Copilot?
Gaps include risks from fabrications, injections, AI phishing, and unchecked agents, highlighted by EY, Gartner, and Lightbeam. Copilot Studio evaluations help fill these during scaling. Checklists and Zero Trust address phishing threats.
What role does EY play in Microsoft AI governance?
EY's partner spotlight at the 2026 AI & Security Summit covers governance strategies for Copilot/M365. It complements Purview and AB-730 sessions on risks. Focus is on practical mitigations for enterprises.
How do Copilot Studio evaluations address governance gaps?
Built-in evaluations in Copilot Studio fill quality and risk gaps for scaling AI agents. They provide checklists for fabrications and injections. This supports operational governance alongside Purview and Zero Trust.
Purview/EY/AB-730 (ex-1ee3b052) cover risks (fabrications/injection)/agents/checklists; Lightbeam/Gartner/Zero Trust/AI phishing; Studio evals fill gaps amid scaling.