Rising geopolitical risk, record policy uncertainty and strategic importance of rare earths

Geopolitics, Uncertainty & Critical Minerals

2026: A Year of Unprecedented Geopolitical Turmoil, Policy Uncertainty, and Strategic Battles for Rare Earths

The geopolitical landscape of 2026 continues to unfold as one of the most tumultuous and unpredictable eras in modern history. Driven by record-breaking policy uncertainty, an escalating US–China rivalry, and the strategic importance of critical resources—particularly rare earth elements—this year marks a pivotal moment where technological sovereignty and resource independence have become central to global power dynamics. As nations race to secure their technological futures, the world faces a complex web of diplomatic, legal, and market-driven developments that threaten to reshape the international order for decades to come.

Surge in Global Uncertainty and Reinforced US–China Rivalry

In early 2026, the World Uncertainty Index soared to an unprecedented 106,862 in February, reflecting profound instability across economic, political, and diplomatic spheres worldwide. This spike underscores the fragility of the current international system amid rising trade tensions, strategic flashpoints such as Taiwan, and fierce competition for technological dominance.

Taiwan remains a critical node in the global supply chain, especially as TSMC, the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturer, continues to be a focal point of strategic contention. Despite 8.63% economic growth in 2025, Taiwan’s importance in advanced chip production cements its position at the core of the US–China rivalry. The ongoing struggle over Taiwan’s sovereignty and security has intensified, with military posturing escalating and diplomatic backing shifting amid global uncertainties.

At Davos 2026, global leaders issued stark warnings about the fragility of the international order, emphasizing that escalating conflicts could have unpredictable, far-reaching consequences. The central theme remains the US–China strategic competition, which has intensified across key arenas:

Taiwan: A strategic and military flashpoint vital for semiconductor manufacturing.
Technological and Resource Competition: Control over semiconductors, critical minerals, and notably rare earth elements has become paramount. Both superpowers aim to build resilient, autonomous supply chains, especially as technological innovation accelerates.

China has doubled down on efforts to expand domestic resource extraction and forge strategic alliances across Africa and Southeast Asia, seeking to diversify supply sources for critical minerals—including rare earths—which are indispensable for AI hardware, electric vehicles, and military systems reliant on these materials. Recent initiatives include large-scale investments in mining projects abroad and diplomatic outreach to secure stable supply routes.

The Strategic and Geopolitical Significance of Rare Earth Elements

While oil’s prominence has waned, rare earth elements—the 17 critical elements necessary for high-tech manufacturing—have emerged as a strategic linchpin. These elements underpin electronics, renewable energy infrastructure, and military systems, making their control a matter of national security.

Market analysis reveals a disconnection between physical availability and market valuation, emphasizing the geopolitical leverage held by dominant producers:

China’s Monopoly: China continues to dominate global rare earth production, wielding influence over prices, supply chains, and diplomatic negotiations. Its strategic power was recently highlighted as it expanded efforts to secure resource access in Africa and Southeast Asia, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign imports and counteract Western efforts to diversify sources.
Global Diversification Strategies:
- The United States is investing heavily in domestic mining, recycling, and technological innovations to reduce dependence on Chinese supplies.
- The European Union is actively forming alliances with African and Southeast Asian suppliers to diversify critical mineral sources amid fears of overdependence.
- India is rapidly emerging as a key player, leveraging 7.2% economic growth and proactive policies to bolster critical mineral extraction and advanced manufacturing.

Major Investments and Technological Innovation

Financial initiatives underscore a strategic pivot:

The Peak XV Fund, which recently raised $1.3 billion, exemplifies investor confidence in India’s critical minerals sector and emerging markets’ tech ecosystems such as AI and fintech. This influx aims to support domestic resource development and technological innovation.
Governments and private firms are investing heavily in recycling infrastructure and new extraction technologies to mitigate supply risks and enhance resilience.

Furthermore, the demand for advanced semiconductors driven by AI and high-performance computing continues to surge. Notably:

OpenAI has closed a $10 billion funding round at a $300 billion valuation, surpassing many Fortune 500 companies. This monumental valuation underscores the importance of AI hardware and the critical minerals powering it.
SambaNova, a leading AI hardware company, has unveiled its SN50 AI chip, backed by Intel’s strategic partnership and a $350 million fundraise, with SoftBank as its first customer. This highlights the escalating need for rare earth inputs in next-generation chips.

India’s Rising Strategic Role

India’s rapid economic growth and proactive policies are positioning it as a regional hub for technology and resource security. Recent developments include:

The $1.3 billion raised by Peak XV supports investments in AI, fintech, and cross-border collaborations.
Strategic government policies aim to expand domestic mineral extraction, invest in recycling, and foster technological innovation—reducing reliance on external sources and strengthening regional influence.
India’s focus on critical mineral extraction and advanced manufacturing is part of its ambition to become a key node in the global supply chain for rare earths and high-tech products.

These efforts are reinforced by diplomatic initiatives and international partnerships, aiming to secure supply chains and build resilience against geopolitical disruptions.

Legal and Trade-Policy Turbulence Amplifies Uncertainty

Legal rulings and shifting trade policies have added layers of complexity to an already volatile environment:

US Supreme Court Ruling and Its Impact

In late 2025, the US Supreme Court limited the federal government’s authority to impose certain tariffs and trade restrictions on critical imports, including rare earths and semiconductor components. While aimed at protecting domestic industries, this decision has complicated trade negotiations and restrictions, making it more difficult for policymakers to secure supply chains effectively. Analysts warn that this legal shift may hamper efforts to control critical mineral exports and hinder strategic stockpiling.

Broader Trade Developments

Additional export controls, foreign investment restrictions, and tariff adjustments have contributed to policy uncertainty, disrupting supply chains and slowing long-term investments. As Reuters reported, these measures hinder resource development and international cooperation, leading to increased market volatility.

Strategic Responses

In response, governments and industries are adopting alternative strategies:

Diplomatic efforts and bilateral agreements aim to bypass legal restrictions and secure critical mineral supplies.
Former President Trump announced plans to work around the Supreme Court’s rulings, exploring new trade routes and agreements—a move highlighted in recent reports titled "Trump aims to work around Supreme Court's tariff ruling." Such efforts include bilateral resource-sharing agreements and diplomatic outreach to non-traditional partners.
Countries are accelerating domestic resource development and diplomatic outreach to fortify resource sovereignty.

Capital Flows, Investor Sentiment, and Market Dynamics

The combination of policy uncertainty and geopolitical tensions has heightened risk aversion among investors, leading to a regional diversification of capital flows:

Emerging markets like India are attracting increased investment as resilient alternatives to traditional supply chains.
The disconnect between resource availability and valuation underscores the importance of resource diplomacy and technological sovereignty.

Repricing of Scarcity and Investor Confidence

In recent Lead-Lag Live discussions, experts emphasized that:

"Scarcity itself is increasingly being viewed as a tradable asset class," reflecting a growing investor recognition of resource security’s geopolitical importance. This re-pricing of scarcity signifies a paradigm shift—where critical commodities related to strategic interests are now viewed through a financial lens, emphasizing long-term strategic positioning.

Asian tech rallies and emerging-market outperformance, especially in semiconductors and critical materials, bolster capital inflows into India and Southeast Asia, reinforcing their roles as resilient tech hubs.

The Latest Developments Reinforcing Strategic Competition

Major Private Sector Investments in AI Hardware

The ongoing demand for advanced semiconductors, driven by AI and high-performance computing, is exemplified by recent significant financings:

MatX, an AI chip startup, has raised $500 million in a funding round led by Jane Street and Situational Awareness. This influx underscores the intensifying race to develop next-generation AI chips capable of supporting agentic AI workloads.
SambaNova has unveiled its SN50 AI chip, supporting complex AI applications. This development is backed by Intel’s strategic partnership and a $350 million fundraise, with SoftBank as its first customer. Such collaborations highlight the escalating importance of resource-intensive AI hardware and the demand for rare earth inputs in high-performance semiconductors.

European and Asian Innovation Push

European AI chip startup Axelera recently secured an additional $250 million in funding led by Innovation Industries, with participation from BlackRock and SiteGround. This capital underscores Europe’s strategic push to develop indigenous AI hardware capabilities amid the broader competition for critical resources and technological independence.

Corporate and Strategic Dealings

Meta announced a $100 billion AMD chip deal as part of its push toward ‘personal superintelligence’, reflecting the surging demand for advanced semiconductors reliant on rare earth inputs.
The tech sector's mergers and acquisitions activity reveal a keen awareness that control over critical minerals and state-of-the-art chip manufacturing is fundamental to future dominance.

Current Status and Broader Implications

As mid-2026 unfolds, the world remains highly volatile, characterized by ongoing supply chain reconfigurations, diplomatic realignments, and intensified geopolitical competition. The race for rare earths exemplifies this era—where technological sovereignty and resource independence are pivotal to national security and global influence.

Key Takeaways:

China’s dominance in rare earth production persists but faces growing challenges from the US, EU, and India.
Massive investments, such as Peak XV’s $1.3 billion fund and Axelera’s $250 million raise, highlight a strategic pivot toward critical minerals as vital assets for future power projection.
Legal rulings like the US Supreme Court decision amplify policy uncertainty, prompting adaptive and resilient strategies among nations.

Broader Implications

2026 is a watershed year—a period marked by heightened risks but also unprecedented opportunities. Success in resource independence and technological sovereignty will determine which nations lead in this new geopolitical landscape. The contests over rare earths and critical minerals are fundamentally reshaping global influence, with resources and technology emerging as the new pillars of power.

As supply chains are reconfigured and alliances shift, diplomacy, innovation, and resource resilience will be decisive. The race for rare earths exemplifies a broader trend—control over critical resources is no longer solely an economic issue but a central component of geopolitical strategy that will influence the world order for decades.

The Role of Strategic Industry and Policy Shifts

Recent developments have underscored the importance of strategic industry investments and policy shifts. For example, Germany’s strategic dilemma between aligning with the US or China has been a focal point in recent analyses. A recent YouTube feature titled "Germany’s strategic dilemma between the US and China: Who is the better partner?" explores the nuanced geopolitical balancing act faced by Berlin, which is crucial given Germany’s role as Europe’s industrial powerhouse and its dependency on critical mineral imports and tech alliances.

This dilemma highlights the shifting alliance dynamics and the geopolitical implications for critical-mineral and tech partnerships. Countries are increasingly weighing economic benefits against security risks, influencing future collaborations and supply chain resilience strategies.

Conclusion

2026 is a defining year, illustrating the interplay of policy uncertainty, geopolitical rivalry, and resource competition. The race for critical minerals, especially rare earths, underscores a fundamental truth: technological sovereignty and resource control are now indispensable to national security and global influence. The outcomes of these strategic battles will shape the next era of technological innovation and international power, positioning resource control as the ultimate currency of geopolitics in the years ahead.

The synergy between AI hardware breakthroughs—such as SambaNova’s SN50 chip supported by Intel and SoftBank—and resource geopolitics underscores a critical insight: technological progress is increasingly intertwined with resource security. The ongoing investments in domestic mining, recycling, and innovative extraction technologies reflect a global recognition that control over critical minerals is essential for future resilience and influence.

As supply chains are reconfigured and diplomatic alliances shift, diplomacy, innovation, and resource diplomacy will be the decisive factors. 2026 has set the stage for a new world order where resources and technology form the twin pillars of power—shaping geopolitical influence for decades to come.

Sources (21)