Housing affordability, zoning conflicts, production setbacks, homelessness governance, and federal/state funding dynamics

Bay Area Housing Markets & Policy

The San Francisco Bay Area’s housing crisis in 2028 deepens amid soaring prices, intensifying displacement, and persistent supply constraints, compounded by homelessness governance challenges, fraught policy battles, and escalating climate risks. Recent developments—including significant federal funding inflows, stalled production pipelines, and contentious local initiatives—highlight the urgent need for coordinated, equity-centered solutions to an increasingly complex ecosystem of housing instability.

Housing Affordability Crisis Intensifies with Record Prices and Rising Displacement

The affordability squeeze tightens most acutely in central San Francisco neighborhoods, where the median home price has surged beyond $2.3 million, reflecting a staggering 30% year-over-year increase that far outpaces regional wage growth. This price escalation is forcing many middle-income households to seek housing in distant suburbs or leave the Bay Area altogether, accelerating demographic shifts and community fragmentation.

Concurrently, eviction filings have climbed another 15% in vulnerable districts like the Tenderloin and Excelsior, amplifying displacement risks for low-income residents already grappling with housing precarity. The erosion of intergenerational housing wealth compounds these pressures, as heirs face soaring property taxes, upkeep costs, and fierce competition from institutional investors snapping up family homes—further thinning the affordable housing stock.

Housing advocates, such as Emil De Guzman, underscore the critical need to expand affordable housing eligibility criteria:

“Without broadening access, affordable housing programs will remain out of reach for those who need them most.”

Rigid income thresholds exclude many at-risk populations, limiting program impact and perpetuating inequities.

A promising legislative development is the growing momentum behind a statewide initiative to strengthen protections for Section 8 voucher holders, targeting eviction discrimination and aiming to preserve housing stability for low-income renters. Yet, the persistent “singles tax” continues to disproportionately disadvantage unmarried homebuyers, further restricting equitable access to homeownership in an exclusionary market.

Supply Constraints Persist: Zoning Deadlocks, Redevelopment Stalls, and Production Setbacks

The Bay Area’s critical housing shortage remains entrenched by exclusionary zoning, project delays, and faltering innovative production efforts.

Nearly half of San Francisco’s residential land remains zoned exclusively for single-family homes, sustaining economic and racial segregation and blocking essential densification needed to close supply gaps.
The controversial “Family Zoning” initiative faces mounting criticism for entrenching exclusionary practices without offering tangible housing solutions.
While the Fry’s Electronics redevelopment site in Palo Alto shows cautious progress, infrastructure capacity concerns continue to weigh heavily on project viability. In contrast, the former St. Anne’s Home luxury housing development remains stalled amid ongoing legal challenges and vocal community opposition.
San Francisco’s approval of its tallest-ever high-rise tower signals political will for densification; however, transit constraints and environmental debates temper enthusiasm and raise questions about sustainable growth.
The office-to-residential conversion pipeline remains stalled, with no completed projects in four years despite dedicated funding, hindered by regulatory hurdles and market uncertainty.
The modular housing sector, once a beacon of production innovation, is now unraveling:
- Harbinger Production layoffs and WARN notices at SummerHill Homes reveal a deepening crisis fueled by labor shortages, supply chain disruptions, and volatile material costs threatening this critical pipeline.

In a controversial move, Mayor Daniel Lurie has proposed reducing the property transfer tax on high-value properties ($5M–$10M), aiming to unlock capital for stalled developments by lowering transaction costs. Proponents argue this could catalyze housing projects, but critics warn it risks slashing essential revenue streams that fund affordable housing and social services.

Meanwhile, enforcement of expanded short-term rental restrictions in affluent municipalities continues to protect long-term rental stock, although displacement of listings to less-regulated platforms undermines the overall impact.

San Jose’s innovative pilot program converting nearly 200 units at The Fay—a downtown 23-story high-rise—into middle-income housing marks a rare success, strategically repurposing existing stock to inject much-needed affordable options into a constrained market.

Homelessness Governance Faces Ongoing Turmoil Amid Scandals and Shifting Policies

Homelessness management remains fraught, with systemic challenges, contested enforcement tactics, and fragile service delivery, though some initiatives offer cautious optimism.

San Jose’s plan to dismantle “The Jungle,” the city’s last large homeless encampment, by mid-April reflects a policy shift emphasizing clearance but raises significant concerns about displacement without adequate shelter alternatives.
The rise of vehicle-based living (RVs, vans) persists, complicated by exploitative “vanlord” practices charging exorbitant parking fees, which hinder outreach and transitions to permanent housing.
Safe parking programs, such as the Berryessa Safe Parking Site, remain vital low-barrier options, but aggressive enforcement—most notably Palo Alto’s harsh RV towing policies—has provoked community backlash. Advocates call for more compassionate, housing-focused approaches.
Berkeley and other jurisdictions advocate for phased, dignified transitions away from vehicle-based living, focusing on permanent housing pathways rather than punitive tactics.
San Jose’s encampment enforcement police unit faces criticism for aggressive methods that risk exacerbating trauma and undermining trust between unhoused residents and authorities.

The sector was rocked by the indictment of Gwendolyn Westbrook, former CEO of the United Council for Human Services, accused of embezzling $1.2 million in public funds, fueling public outrage and eroding nonprofit credibility.

Shelter operations remain precarious:

A recent operational breakdown at a San Jose prefabricated shelter severely impacted worker morale and service quality, laying bare systemic vulnerabilities in emergency housing models.

On a more positive note:

Hotel-to-shelter conversions and investments in sober living facilities offering trauma-informed care are gaining ground, providing more supportive, long-term housing solutions.
West Valley Community Services secured a $200,000 federal grant for a roaming services van, enhancing outreach in underserved communities.

State lawmakers and advocacy groups persistently push for restoration and expansion of homelessness program funding, emphasizing the urgent need for stable financial support amid escalating demand.

Federal and State Funding, Policy Battles, and Legal Disputes Shape the Housing Landscape

Funding dynamics and legislative initiatives remain pivotal in shaping Bay Area housing and homelessness outcomes.

The region secured over $33 million in federal grants across 17 projects, spanning violence prevention, affordable housing, and health services, with Senator Alex Padilla playing a key role.
Representative Ro Khanna notably secured more than $13 million for community projects in California’s 17th Congressional District, bolstering local capacity for housing and social supports.
Governor Gavin Newsom approved a $590 million emergency loan package for Bay Area transit agencies, critical for infrastructure resilience amid ridership declines linked to housing pressures.
The controversial California billionaire tax proposal, intended to fund affordable housing and social services, faces opposition from developers and investors concerned about capital flow and construction delays.
The AB-2390 housing streamlining bill, aimed at expediting development approvals on hazardous sites through 2036, encounters pushback over climate risks and calls for stronger anti-displacement safeguards.
Senate Bill 1091 (AB-1091) remains a key legislative focus for advocates seeking to stabilize the statewide low-income housing market and close access gaps.
San Francisco launched a new permitting portal with integrated payments designed to reduce bureaucratic delays; its effectiveness remains to be demonstrated.
San Jose is embroiled in a lawsuit from a local business owner against the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), alleging revenue loss following property acquisition via eminent domain—highlighting tensions between infrastructure projects and community economic interests.
In the wake of nonprofit corruption scandals, calls for increased oversight, transparency, and community participation in homelessness service governance have intensified.

Climate Change and Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Compound Housing Challenges

The intersection of climate risks and infrastructure fragility increasingly complicates redevelopment and transit-oriented housing strategies.

Updated environmental assessments reveal rising flood and land subsidence risks in marginalized areas such as Hunters Point, complicating redevelopment and raising environmental justice concerns.
Forecasters warn of an impending atmospheric river event, threatening heavy rains and flooding that jeopardize fragile infrastructure and ongoing construction.
A recent fire near BART’s Transbay Tube tracks caused significant service shutdowns, exposing critical transit vulnerabilities central to transit-oriented housing plans.
State legislation proposing expanded eminent domain authority over PG&E assets aims to accelerate utility modernization and reduce wildfire risks but faces significant opposition from stakeholders.
Community frustration grows over prolonged construction hazards, such as the large exposed excavation pit in Mountain View, spotlighting tensions between development pace and neighborhood safety.

Strategic Priorities and Pathways Forward

Addressing the Bay Area’s multifaceted housing emergency demands bold, coordinated, and equity-focused strategies:

Dismantling exclusionary single-family zoning is critical to confronting segregation and unlocking meaningful housing growth, especially in affluent suburbs.
Reforming affordable housing eligibility criteria is essential to broaden access and prevent displacement of vulnerable populations.
Stabilizing and scaling the modular and mixed-use construction sectors is urgent, given recent layoffs, labor shortages, and supply chain disruptions threatening production pipelines.
Formalizing and integrating vehicle-based living and safe parking programs into official shelter systems can enhance dignity, oversight, and pathways to permanent housing.
Recalibrating policies governing institutional investment is necessary to balance financing needs with housing stability and reduce speculative pressures.
Prioritizing transparent, inclusive community engagement can bridge divides between development proponents and preservationists, fostering consensus for equitable growth.
Restoring accountability and trust in homelessness services through governance reforms and active community participation is imperative following recent corruption scandals.
Embedding climate resilience and environmental justice principles into housing and infrastructure projects ensures sustainable, equitable outcomes amid escalating climate threats.

Conclusion

As 2028 unfolds, the Bay Area confronts a historic housing emergency marked by soaring prices, entrenched zoning deadlock, faltering production, homelessness governance failures, and intersecting economic and climate shocks. New initiatives like San Jose’s middle-income housing pilot provide targeted hope amid broader setbacks, while Mayor Daniel Lurie’s controversial property transfer tax rollback proposal illustrates the difficult balance between incentivizing development and protecting critical social funding.

Legislative advances on renter protections, funding support, and equity-centered advocacy offer glimmers of progress. Yet, overcoming this crisis requires sustained political will, community solidarity, and strategic governance to dismantle structural barriers, stabilize innovative production, expand access for vulnerable populations, and rebuild trust in homelessness services—all while embedding climate resilience and social equity at the core of policy and practice. Only through such integrated approaches can the Bay Area forge a resilient, inclusive housing ecosystem capable of delivering dignity, fairness, and opportunity amid intensifying challenges.

Sources (94)