Middle East strategic crisis: Iran missile threats, GCC fragmentation, and U.S.–Gulf policy (Board of Peace)

The Middle East’s strategic crisis continues to deepen as 2028 unfolds, with Iran’s missile advancements, persistent Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) fragmentation, and evolving U.S.–Gulf relations intensifying an already volatile multipolar security environment. Recent developments spotlight mounting risks across conventional and emerging domains, underscoring the imperative for integrated, multidomain policy strategies to mitigate escalation and maintain regional stability.

---

Iran’s Missile Advancements and Escalation Risks: Heightened Threats and Operational Unpredictability

Iran’s missile capabilities have surged forward, reinforcing Tehran’s asymmetric posture and complicating regional deterrence calculations:

• Confirmed Acquisition of Advanced Chinese N5 Hypersonic Missile Technology:
  Intelligence assessments have solidified previous indications that Iran successfully imported China’s N5 hypersonic missile system, enabling supersonic speeds with advanced maneuverability. These missiles drastically compress reaction times for adversaries, threatening U.S. naval assets such as carrier strike groups operating in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea. Analysts warn this capability could facilitate precision strikes with minimal warning, eroding established U.S. maritime dominance.

• Russian Arms Technology Transfer Bolsters Missile Arsenal:
  Disclosed agreements reveal a €500 million arms technology transfer from Russia to Iran, signed in early 2027, supplementing Chinese support. This multipolar nexus of missile technology proliferation reflects a concerted effort by Moscow and Beijing to circumvent Western arms controls and enhance Iran’s strike capabilities, complicating crisis escalation management.

• Opaque IRGC-Aligned Missile Command Network:
  Investigations have uncovered a shadow missile command comprising approximately 4,000 personnel loyal directly to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and separate from Iran’s regular military hierarchy. This “state within a state” structure exercises autonomous control over missile deployments, proxy operations, and covert strikes. Its decentralized, secretive nature increases unpredictability and raises the risk of inadvertent escalation or misattribution of missile or cyberattacks.

• Escalating Proxy Missile Strikes Target Saudi Infrastructure:
  Iran-backed proxy forces have intensified missile attacks targeting critical Saudi oil and military infrastructure, deploying increasingly sophisticated systems empowered by Tehran’s expanded missile capabilities. This surge in proxy aggression has triggered stern warnings from U.S. and Gulf officials about the fragile regional security balance.

• IRGC Missile Drills Signal Targeting of U.S. Bases:
  Recent Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) missile exercises have explicitly simulated strikes against U.S. military bases in the region, notably highlighting vulnerabilities of key installations such as Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar and Ain al-Asad Air Base in Iraq. These drills underscore Tehran’s intent to deter U.S. intervention and complicate operational planning.

---

GCC Fragmentation Deepens Amid Saudi Assertiveness and External Influences

The Gulf Cooperation Council’s cohesion continues to erode, fracturing under divergent strategic interests and covert actions:

• Saudi Arabia’s Landmark 20-Year LNG Deal with U.S. Firms:
  Saudi Arabia finalized a multibillion-dollar, two-decade liquefied natural gas (LNG) import agreement with leading U.S. energy companies, including Caturus (Commonwealth LNG). This long-term pact enhances Riyadh’s political leverage in Washington and supports its ambitions for global energy leadership amidst fluctuating crude oil production. The deal also signifies increasing energy interdependence between the U.S. and Gulf states amid global market volatility.

• Saudi Defense Industrialization and Procurement Diversification:
  Riyadh’s cancellation of the Pakistan JF-17 Block III fighter acquisition and exploratory talks with Turkey regarding the KAAN stealth fighter reflect an assertive drive to diversify defense sources and advance indigenous military industry, notably through Saudi Arabian Military Industries (SAMI). This industrial transformation was prominently showcased at the 2026 World Defense Show (WDS), signaling Saudi ambitions to reduce reliance on traditional Western suppliers.

  However, this diversification poses interoperability risks with U.S. and allied forces, potentially complicating coordinated military responses and collective escalation management.

• Covert Operations Undermine GCC Trust:
  Newly surfaced intelligence reveals a covert missile strike against Israeli targets executed by an undisclosed GCC member state hosting significant U.S. military assets. This clandestine operation has deeply eroded alliance trust and complicated collective security coordination. Qatar’s delicate balancing act persists as it hosts the U.S. Al-Udeid Air Base while maintaining ties with Tehran, exacerbating GCC fissures and undermining unified deterrence.

• Expanding Chinese Influence in the Gulf:
  China’s footprint in the Gulf region has expanded beyond military-technical cooperation with Iran to include major economic investments, such as a $3 billion Saudi stake in Elon Musk’s AI startup xAI. Concurrently, Beijing’s naval modernization—evidenced by the commissioning of its fourth nuclear-powered aircraft carrier—signals a strategic push into the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf, challenging traditional U.S. maritime supremacy and complicating regional power balances.

---

U.S. Strategic Posture: Strength Tempered by Operational Constraints and Political Challenges

While the United States maintains a formidable military presence, emerging vulnerabilities and internal challenges undermine its regional posture:

• Reinforced Air Deployments Amid Iran Nuclear Talks:
  In response to ongoing nuclear negotiations with Tehran, the U.S. has deployed additional fighter jets to the region, signaling resolve and preparedness to deter Iranian aggression. This deployment aims to balance diplomatic engagement with credible kinetic deterrence.

• Robust but Vulnerable Military Footprint:
  The U.S. continues to maintain approximately 40,000 troops across the Gulf, supported by three nuclear-powered carrier strike groups and advanced ISR assets. However, operational flexibility is curtailed by Iraq’s closure of Ain al-Asad Air Base and limited cooperation from Qatar. Iran’s growing hypersonic missile threat increases the risk of saturation attacks capable of overwhelming layered missile defenses.

• Cyber Defense Impairments Due to DHS Funding Shutdown:
  The ongoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding shutdown, resulting from Congressional gridlock over immigration policy, has critically degraded U.S. homeland cyber defenses. This funding gap coincides with an escalation of Iranian cyber and electronic warfare operations targeting U.S. critical infrastructure and military networks, heightening vulnerabilities.

• Pentagon AI Governance Strains and Personnel Turnover:
  High turnover rates and organizational restructuring within the Department of Defense have impaired joint-force integration and readiness. Additionally, the Pentagon’s increasing reliance on commercial AI platforms, notably Elon Musk’s Grok AI, for classified operations raises significant governance and security concerns. The artificial intelligence company Anthropic publicly declared it “cannot in good conscience accede” to Pentagon demands for AI system access, highlighting resistance within the AI sector to military integration and complicating the blending of commercial and military AI capabilities.

• Mixed Political Messaging Undermines Deterrence:
  Public dismissals by President Trump of senior military warnings on Iranian missile threats have eroded U.S. deterrence credibility. This contradictory messaging emboldens adversaries and unsettles regional partners, complicating alliance cohesion and crisis management.

---

Multidomain Competition and Resource Security: Critical Minerals, AI, and Economic Resilience

Competition extends beyond kinetic domains into resource security and technological innovation critical to military and economic power:

• Expanded U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile Initiative:
  The U.S. government launched a $12 billion strategic stockpiling program targeting rare earth elements and critical minerals essential for advanced defense and energy technologies. This initiative aims to reduce dependency on China-dominated supply chains and bolster resilience against geopolitical disruptions.

• Private Sector Advances in Rare Earths Manufacturing:
  MP Materials announced plans to develop a 120-acre “10X” campus in Northlake, Texas, with a $1.25 billion investment to scale domestic rare earth magnet production. This expansion enhances the U.S. capability to produce critical components for defense systems domestically. Meanwhile, New Frontier has broadened its portfolio to include copper and rare earths, further strengthening U.S. strategic resource availability.

• Allied Resource Cooperation Strengthens Supply Chains:
  The $36 billion Japan–U.S. agreement on joint gas and mineral development projects exemplifies deepening allied interdependence to secure vital energy and mineral supply chains, reinforcing economic resilience within trusted trade blocs.

• AI-Driven Market Influence and Pricing Strategies:
  Reports indicate the Trump administration is exploring Pentagon applications of AI to influence mineral market pricing within allied blocs, seeking to counterbalance China’s market dominance and prevent supply disruptions that could jeopardize defense capabilities.

• New Studies on Domestic Rare Earth Potential:
  A recent New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources report highlights significant rare earth and critical mineral deposits in carbon ore formations, suggesting untapped domestic resource potential that could further reduce U.S. supply vulnerabilities.

• Calls for Multidomain Deconfliction Protocols:
  Experts emphasize urgent development of integrated deconfliction frameworks spanning cyber, space, AI, and conventional military domains to mitigate escalation risks amid increasingly complex and overlapping security challenges.

---

Policy Imperatives: Urgent Need for Integrated and Coordinated Responses

Addressing the multifaceted threats requires comprehensive policy action across diplomatic, military, and technological spheres:

• Immediate Restoration of DHS Cyber Funding:
  Resolving Congressional impasses to end the DHS shutdown is critical to restoring homeland cyber defenses against escalating Iranian cyber and electronic warfare threats.

• Enhanced Congressional Oversight of Nuclear and Arms Cooperation:
  Tightened safeguards and transparency are essential in U.S.–Saudi nuclear cooperation and broader arms transfers to prevent destabilizing proliferation and arms races.

• Mediation and Rebuilding of GCC Cohesion:
  Focused diplomatic efforts are needed to bridge fractures within the GCC, particularly addressing Qatar’s ambiguous stance, to restore trust and enable effective collective deterrence.

• Synchronization of Military Deterrence with Sustained Diplomacy:
  Coordinated kinetic capabilities must be balanced with diplomatic engagement to manage escalation risks and sustain long-term regional security.

• Establishment of AI and Autonomous Weapons Governance Frameworks:
  Developing ethical and operational guidelines for AI-enabled warfare is vital to prevent destabilizing arms competitions and inadvertent escalation.

• Monitoring and Managing Saudi Defense Procurement Diversification:
  Collaborative efforts with partners are necessary to mitigate interoperability challenges from Riyadh’s defense industrialization and ensure coalition effectiveness.

Recent legislative initiatives by Representative Brad Sherman underscore growing Congressional resolve to safeguard strategic stability amid these complex threats.

---

Conclusion: Navigating a Precarious Strategic Crossroads

As 2028 advances, the Middle East stands at a perilous strategic crossroads. Iran’s leap in supersonic and hypersonic missile capabilities, coupled with an opaque missile command structure, significantly heightens risks of rapid strikes and misattribution. Simultaneously, GCC fragmentation, exacerbated by covert operations and Saudi Arabia’s assertive energy diplomacy, reshapes alliance dynamics in ways that complicate unified deterrence. Moreover, the multipolar competition driven by China’s Gulf ambitions and the critical minerals race deepens U.S. policy and military challenges.

Although the United States retains unmatched power projection, internal political gridlock, operational constraints, and emerging vulnerabilities—particularly in cyber and AI domains—pose serious obstacles. Without decisive, integrated policy responses encompassing alliance management, congressional oversight, cyber defense restoration, and AI governance, the risk of regional destabilization and entrenched great-power competition will escalate markedly.

The coming months will be critical in determining whether the Board of Peace initiative and broader U.S.-Gulf strategies adapt effectively to these evolving threats or whether the Middle East slips further into volatility at a time when global security stakes are higher than ever.