How AI, data, and technology governance reshape competition and diplomacy

AI, Technology and Global Power

How AI, Data, and Technology Governance Are Reshaping Global Competition and Diplomacy in 2024

In 2024, the world finds itself at a critical juncture where technological innovation—particularly in artificial intelligence (AI), data governance, and cyber capabilities—is fundamentally transforming the landscape of international power, diplomacy, and security. The rapid pace of advancements, coupled with complex geopolitical rivalries and resource competition, is creating a new paradigm that demands responsible governance, strategic resilience, and multilateral cooperation. This era is characterized by a delicate balance: nations race to harness the benefits of technology while managing escalating risks of conflict, instability, and inequality.

Major Powers Accelerate Investments in AI and Digital Sovereignty

Leading nations—including the United States, China, Russia, India, and regional players—are significantly ramping up investments to secure technological dominance:

Military and Cyber Applications: Countries are deploying AI-powered autonomous weapons, surveillance systems, and cyberattack tools that operate with minimal human oversight. For example, AI-enhanced drones and cyber warfare capabilities are revolutionizing conflict, offering tactical advantages but also raising concerns over miscalculation and proliferation. Recent intelligence reports reveal growing cyber threats targeting critical infrastructure, with state-sponsored groups leveraging AI to accelerate operations, raising alarms about escalation risks.
Digital Sovereignty and Infrastructure: Nations are prioritizing the development of resilient, sovereign digital ecosystems. The European Union’s push towards independent cloud platforms aims to reduce reliance on foreign providers like AWS and Azure, safeguarding against cyber manipulation and espionage. Investments in quantum computing and 5G infrastructure are viewed as vital for maintaining technological sovereignty amid multipolar tensions. Europe's extensive investments in independent cloud systems exemplify this strategic shift.
Risks and Opportunities: The AI arms race fuels concerns about destabilization through unchecked proliferation. However, responsible deployment guided by international norms and transparency offers pathways to security, economic growth, and societal benefits. Notably, the geopolitics of sustainability is emerging as a key factor, intertwining resource management with technological development, as detailed in recent analyses highlighting the three key trends in the geopolitics of sustainability.

The Emergence of an "AI Diplomacy Doctrine"

Recognizing the stakes, experts advocate for a comprehensive AI Diplomacy Doctrine—a strategic framework emphasizing responsible norms, safeguards, and ethical standards at the global level. This initiative aims to:

Prevent misuse and proliferation of autonomous weapons and surveillance systems
Address misinformation and ethical dilemmas associated with AI deployment
Manage the AI arms race through enhanced transparency, verification, and international cooperation

Recent forums have called for binding international agreements on autonomous weapon systems and verification mechanisms akin to traditional arms control treaties. A critical concern is the nexus between AI and nuclear security; integrating AI into nuclear decision-support systems introduces complex verification and safety challenges. Experts warn that autonomous nuclear decision-making could undermine existing arms control regimes, heightening the risk of miscalculation or accidental escalation without robust safeguards.

Key initiatives include:

Establishing norms for responsible AI use in military and security contexts
Developing verification and transparency protocols for AI systems involved in strategic stability
Promoting confidence-building measures among major powers to prevent misunderstandings

The geopolitical contest over strategic narratives is exemplified by recent developments such as "China and Russia respond to Trump’s 'Donroe Doctrine'" videos, emphasizing the importance of multilateral dialogue and norm-setting.

Addressing the AI Divide and Promoting Inclusive Development

Despite technological advancements, a significant AI divide persists globally. Wealthier nations and multinational corporations dominate research and deployment, risking marginalization for low-income countries:

Expert Calls for Equity: The UN Tech Envoy, Amandeep Gill, underscores the importance of shared standards, capacity-building, and open dialogue to prevent geopolitical bifurcation—where incompatible AI ecosystems deepen inequalities.
Regional Collaborations: Countries like India and the UAE are pioneering regional partnerships, focusing on joint research, standards development, and capacity enhancement to foster inclusive growth. These efforts aim to bridge divides and create trustworthy norms that are globally beneficial.
Building Trust: Formation of coalitions of the willing, centered on shared norms and flexible alliances, can help manage risks, prevent monopolization, and ensure AI benefits are accessible worldwide.

Infrastructure, Crisis Response, and Scientific Capacity

Technologies such as satellite imagery, remote sensing, and open-source data are increasingly vital for conflict monitoring, humanitarian aid, and early crisis detection. These tools enable real-time insights into inaccessible or conflict-affected zones, improving response effectiveness.

However, recent developments highlight vulnerabilities:

Erosion of Scientific Capacity: Funding cuts and politicization threaten the global ability to respond swiftly to crises. Maintaining robust scientific infrastructure, fostering international collaboration, and ensuring continued investment are essential for resilience.
Strategic Sovereign Infrastructure Investments: European nations are heavily investing in sovereign cloud and data security systems to reduce reliance on foreign providers and bolster protection against cyberattacks and misinformation campaigns.

These efforts aim to create resilient, secure infrastructure that supports rapid crisis response, maintains scientific progress, and sustains diplomatic cooperation.

The Rising Influence of Small States and Private Sector Actors

While traditional diplomacy centers on major powers, small states such as Estonia and Singapore are increasingly asserting influence in cyber norm-setting:

"Small States, Big Stakes": Leveraging their focus on cyber resilience, sovereignty, and governance, these nations actively shape global cyber standards through participation in forums like the UN and regional negotiations. Their involvement helps prevent cyber conflicts and promotes trustworthy norms.
Norm Development and Verification: Small states contribute to confidence-building measures and verification mechanisms, fostering trust among diverse actors and emphasizing inclusive governance.

The private sector’s role continues to grow, with public-private partnerships and multistakeholder initiatives becoming crucial in managing supply chains, setting norms, and fostering resilience across critical sectors.

The Nuclear–AI Nexus: New Security Challenges

The integration of AI into nuclear and strategic security systems introduces complex vulnerabilities:

Enhanced Monitoring and Risks of Autonomy: AI-driven surveillance and decision-support systems can improve non-proliferation efforts, but autonomous systems pose risks of miscalculation, escalation, or accidental conflict if safeguards are absent.
Challenges to Arms Control Regimes: Autonomous decision-making in nuclear contexts risks undermining existing treaties. Experts warn that without international safeguards and verification, AI could destabilize strategic stability, increasing misunderstanding or unintended escalation.

Recent discussions emphasize the urgent need for verification protocols and transparency measures to mitigate these risks, ensuring AI’s integration into nuclear security enhances stability rather than threatens it.

Resource Geopolitics and Critical Material Control

Competition over rare earth elements and critical minerals—such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel—has intensified:

China’s Dominance: As outlined by Craig Tindale, China controls significant portions of critical mineral supply chains, giving it leverage over global technology development and electrification efforts.
Diversification Strategies: Countries are investing in domestic mining, recycling, and sustainable extraction technologies. New trade alliances and innovations aim to reduce dependence on China, echoing past resource conflicts and emphasizing resource sovereignty as a security concern.

Evolving Regional Dynamics and the Role of Crisis and Resilience

Recent analyses, including "Late-Phase Failure and the Erosion of Military Effectiveness in Prolonged Conflict", highlight how prolonged conflicts erode military effectiveness over time, reinforcing the importance of resilience and adaptability:

Military Effectiveness in Decline: As conflicts extend, logistical strains, attrition, and technology fatigue diminish military capabilities. This emphasizes the need for robust supply chains, technological innovation, and strategic agility.
Regional Alliances and Small State Roles: Small states are increasingly pivotal in cyber and diplomatic resilience, creating trust networks and buffer zones that can mitigate escalation risks.

Current Status and Future Implications

The landscape of technological competition and diplomacy in 2024 is marked by heightened tensions but also unprecedented cooperation opportunities. The multipolar environment, with the US, China, Russia, India, and smaller states vying for influence, underscores the importance of inclusive governance frameworks.

Policy priorities moving forward include:

Establishing verification and safeguards for AI systems involved in strategic and nuclear contexts
Diversifying supply chains for critical materials and technological components to reduce dependency
Investing in sovereign digital and scientific infrastructure to bolster resilience
Fostering inclusive, transparent multistakeholder norms that encompass state, private sector, and civil society actors
Strengthening crisis-response capabilities through technological innovation and international cooperation

Conclusion: Navigating a Complex, Transformative Era

The convergence of AI, data governance, resource geopolitics, and cyber capabilities is reshaping how nations compete, cooperate, and project power. Achieving a stable, equitable, and resilient international order hinges on collective action, responsible governance, and inclusive diplomacy.

Building trust through transparency, fostering multilateral dialogue, and embracing diverse stakeholders are vital to harness technology’s potential while mitigating its risks. The stakes are high: missed opportunities, reckless escalation, or fragmentation could undermine global stability and deepen inequalities.

In this transformative era, urgent, coordinated efforts are essential to steer technological progress toward human-centered, verifiable, and inclusive frameworks, ensuring peace, stability, and shared prosperity for all nations.

Sources (14)