How AI capex, execution risk, and macro/credit fragilities are repricing megacap tech and driving a rotation to value and defensives

AI Disruption and Market Rotation

The global equity landscape in 2026 remains profoundly shaped by the ongoing interplay of massive AI capital expenditures (capex), heightened execution risk, and deepening macro/credit fragilities. These forces have collectively driven a >$1 trillion valuation repricing in the megacap technology and software sectors, prompting a decisive and broad rotation toward value equities, defensive sectors, and real assets. Recent developments have reinforced and expanded this narrative, revealing escalating household financial stress, deteriorating real estate credit conditions, and a growing chorus of income-focused investors seeking refuge amid market overvaluation and uncertainty.

At the same time, behavioral and governance disciplines have emerged as critical guardrails, helping investors avoid the pitfalls of cognitive capitulation and herd mentality that threaten to amplify volatility. Institutional investors and market leaders like Berkshire Hathaway under Greg Abel continue to emphasize valuation rigor, disciplined capital allocation, and pragmatic risk management as essential strategies to navigate the AI-driven transformation in a fragile macro-financial environment.

AI Capex and Execution Risk: Still Central Amid Growing Macro and Credit Pressures

AI’s capital intensity and execution complexity remain core challenges, particularly as hyperscale firms and financial institutions grapple with uncertain and deferred returns:

Amazon’s AI spending is under renewed investor scrutiny, with calls for clearer near- to medium-term returns intensifying amid operational risks and rising interest rates. The academic work “Debugging Overconfidence: Is AI Too Sure of Itself?” highlights how AI models’ excessive confidence complicates valuation and risk assessment, reinforcing market skepticism.
JPMorgan’s rollout of large language models (LLMs) continues to exemplify AI integration complexity, with muted near-term financial impact and increasing regulatory oversight. This underscores the need for scenario-based valuation models that explicitly incorporate execution and regulatory risks.
Software sector multiple compression persists, with companies like Constellation Software still under pressure following the $300 billion market selloff in 2025. Investors demand tangible evidence of AI-driven margin expansion and sustainable competitive advantages rather than hype.
Valuation thought leaders such as Aswath Damodaran advocate embedding multiple outcome scenarios, capital intensity, and execution failure risks into valuation frameworks, aligning with William C. Rader’s emphasis on earnings quality, disciplined capital allocation, and margin of safety.

Macro and Credit Fragilities Deepen, Amplifying Refinancing and Liquidity Risks

Recent data paints a more concerning picture of household and real estate credit stress, intensifying the vulnerabilities for AI-levered firms dependent on debt financing:

Rising Consumer Delinquencies Reshape the Housing Market: New York Fed data reveals overall household delinquencies rose to 4.8% in Q4 2025, with increases concentrated in credit cards and personal loans. This elevated household leverage threatens broader economic stability and consumer spending, directly impacting credit availability for corporates.
KBRA Reports Uptick in CMBS Delinquencies: The Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA) noted that the 30+ day delinquency rate among KBRA-rated U.S. private label Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) increased to 4.5% in January 2026, signaling stress in commercial real estate financing. The rising distress rates heighten refinancing risks for real estate assets underpinning many AI infrastructure projects.
Blue Owl Private Credit Crisis Deepens: The $1.8 trillion private credit market is under acute pressure, with rising defaults, investor redemptions, and liquidity shortages reminiscent of leveraged private debt crises. This environment raises the stakes for AI projects reliant on private credit and calls for rigorous credit risk management.
NBFC Sector Under Pressure: Non-bank financial companies face margin compression and valuation resets amid digital lending disruptions, constraining alternative credit sources vital for AI capex funding.
Household Leverage Amplifies Macro Fragility: Elevated consumer debt levels, particularly in revolving credit, exacerbate risks in a high-rate environment. Warren Buffett’s recent cautionary remarks about speculative excess underscore the need for investors to temper AI enthusiasm with macro prudence.
Reflecting these risks, LPL Research’s 2026 guidance recommends a modest equity underweight, favoring sectors with strong cash flows and resilient credit profiles.

Income and Defensive Investor Sentiment: Seeking Stability in an Overvalued Market

With growth tech valuations under pressure and macro risks mounting, income-oriented investors are vocalizing their concerns and preferences:

Dividend investor Rebecca Teltscher candidly expressed her frustration in “I Hate This Market”, underscoring the challenge of finding attractively valued, high-quality income stocks amid elevated market multiples. She favors companies with stable cash flows, robust dividend histories, and predictable earnings, highlighting sectors such as utilities, consumer staples, and select subscription-based media.
The demand for income stability has fueled dividend hikes and buyout speculation, as detailed in “Dividend Hikes and a Buyout Rumor”. Defensive sectors with consistent dividend growth are attracting capital flows, reflecting a flight to income amid AI uncertainty and broader market volatility.
Berkshire Hathaway’s recent portfolio moves under Greg Abel mirror these themes:
- Trimming Apple shares amid AI capex risk and valuation concerns.
- Increasing stake in The New York Times, a subscription-based media company with recurring revenues.
- A $1.4 billion investment in Domino’s Pizza, representing operational discipline and cash flow resilience.
Other operationally disciplined non-tech leaders like Estée Lauder, Kraft Heinz, and Fairfax Financial have gained favor, alongside real assets such as infrastructure, renewables, and real estate, which offer income stability and inflation protection.

Behavioral and Governance Imperatives: Guarding Against Cognitive Capitulation

In a market rife with complexity and uncertainty, behavioral discipline and cognitive governance are indispensable:

The article “How People Turn Cognitive Discipline Into Trading Edge” highlights practical strategies to manage uncertainty and avoid emotional trading mistakes. Techniques include exposure kill switches, mandatory holding periods, and disciplined rebalancing to mitigate retail-driven volatility and herd behavior.
The risk of cognitive capitulation, where investors surrender independent judgment to AI-driven consensus, remains a key concern. “Are We Cruising Toward Cognitive Capitulation?” warns that such behavior can exacerbate market swings and mispricing.
Emotional cycles and sentiment shifts are documented in “From Fear to Neutral: The Behavioral Psychology Behind the Market’s Rally”, emphasizing the need for patience and contrarian discipline.
Charlie Munger’s “circle of competence” philosophy and mental model latticework remain vital guides for investors navigating AI’s complexity, as reinforced by classical value investing tenets and Buffett’s final advice focusing on patience, emotional control, and long-term thinking.
The analysis “Why Warren Buffett’s Superpower Is an Achilles Heel for AI” notes Buffett’s traditional skepticism towards tech complexity but acknowledges that Greg Abel’s leadership is blending classical value principles with pragmatic AI-era adaptations.

Reinforced Actionable Frameworks for AI-Era Investing

Investor frameworks continue evolving, integrating sophisticated tools to balance AI opportunities against execution and macro risks:

Scenario-based valuations embedding capital intensity, timing uncertainties, and execution failure probabilities are becoming standard practice, advocated by experts like Damodaran and Rader.
Granular capital structure monitoring—tracking debt maturities, leverage, and AI capex commitments—enables early detection of refinancing risks amid tighter credit.
Behavioral finance protocols such as kill switches and mandatory hold periods guard against impulsive decision-making.
Emphasis remains on favoring companies with durable moats, recurring revenue models (e.g., Adobe, Intuit, MSCI), and strong free cash flows that balance cautious AI adoption with financial resilience.
Active management with rigorous valuation discipline is preferred over passive strategies heavily exposed to overvalued tech.
Reaffirmation of classical value investing principles from Benjamin Graham and Charlie Munger remains a bedrock for investment decision-making in this complex environment.
Newly surfaced insights, such as “Learn from the Oracle of Omaha, Buffett! A breakdown of the 'secret arsenal' behind value investing”, distill Buffett’s timeless guidance on quality businesses, capital allocation discipline, patience, and emotional control—cornerstones for success amid AI-driven market complexity.

Greg Abel’s Inaugural Berkshire Hathaway Letter: A Pragmatic Post-Buffett Blueprint

Greg Abel’s first shareholder letter, released in early 2026, sets a clear and pragmatic tone for Berkshire’s future strategy:

Valuation discipline and margin of safety remain foundational, applied now against the backdrop of AI’s capital demands and macro uncertainty.
Abel balances recognition of AI’s transformative potential with rigorous risk management, capital intensity scrutiny, and refinancing risk awareness.
Portfolio repositioning—trimming high-valuation tech, increasing stakes in subscription media and cash-flow resilient businesses—embodies a risk-aware, quality-focused approach.
The letter has been broadly praised for providing institutional investors a blueprint for navigating AI-driven complexity with discipline, patience, and active risk governance.

Conclusion: Discipline and Prudence in Navigating the AI-Driven Investment Landscape

As 2026 unfolds, the investment environment remains deeply influenced by massive AI capex, elevated execution risk, and intensifying macro/credit fragilities, driving a profound valuation recalibration exceeding $1 trillion in megacap tech and software sectors. This shift signals a maturing market moving decisively from unbridled enthusiasm to pragmatic, risk-aware investing.

The leadership transition at Berkshire Hathaway—with Greg Abel’s emphasis on valuation rigor, portfolio discipline, and practical capital allocation—embodies this evolution. Meanwhile, mounting evidence of household financial stress and deteriorating real estate credit conditions amplify refinancing and liquidity risks, underscoring the importance of vigilant credit risk management.

Behavioral risks demand active governance and steadfast adherence to one’s circle of competence, while institutional investors increasingly deploy integrated valuation frameworks, capital structure analytics, and behavioral protocols. Diversification into value equities, defensives, and real assets remains a core strategy to enhance income stability and mitigate inflation and credit risks.

Success in this complex, AI-transformed landscape requires a disciplined investment approach combining scenario-based valuation, integrated risk frameworks, behavioral finance rigor, and portfolio diversification. By balancing AI’s transformative promise with valuation discipline and behavioral prudence, investors can pursue sustainable, risk-adjusted returns amid heightened uncertainty.

Selected Additional References for Further Insight

Real estate agents take notice: Rising consumer delinquencies are repositioning the housing market — New York Fed Q4 2025 data
KBRA Reports January Increases in CMBS Delinquency, Distress Rates — Kroll Bond Rating Agency, January 2026
“I Hate This Market” – Dividend Investor Rebecca Teltscher on What to Buy in an Overvalued Market
How People Turn Cognitive Discipline Into Trading Edge
Greg Abel’s First Berkshire Letter Will Set The Tone After Buffett — Finimize, February 2026
William C. Rader Redefines Stock Valuation with a Timeless Framework
From Fear to Neutral: The Behavioral Psychology Behind the Market’s Rally
Debugging Overconfidence: Is AI Too Sure of Itself?
Dividend Hikes and a Buyout Rumor
Are We Cruising Toward Cognitive Capitulation?
Value Outperforms Growth in Early 2026 Shift — StoneX
Why Warren Buffett’s Superpower Is an Achilles Heel for AI
Berkshire CEO Abel to lay out thinking for a post-Buffett world — Reuters, Feb 26, 2026
Learn from the Oracle of Omaha, Buffett! A breakdown of the 'secret arsenal' behind value investing

Together, these insights confirm that massive AI capex, elevated execution risk, and macro/credit fragilities are fundamentally reshaping megacap tech valuations, while behavioral discipline and classical value investing frameworks remain indispensable for navigating today’s AI-driven, volatile investment landscape.

Sources (81)