The 2024 Landscape of Sustainability Reporting: A Year of Harmonization, Regulation, and Innovation

The sustainability reporting ecosystem in 2024 is witnessing unprecedented transformation, driven by a global push toward harmonization, regulatory rigor, advancements in assurance, and digital innovation. These developments are fundamentally reshaping how corporations disclose, verify, and utilize ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data—core elements for fostering trust, enhancing comparability, and informing strategic decision-making aligned with climate and social goals.

This year marks a paradigm shift: moving away from fragmented, region-specific disclosures toward an integrated, transparent, and performance-oriented landscape. The overarching goal is to meet rising stakeholder and investor expectations, ensure regulatory compliance, and embed sustainability into the very fabric of business operations.

---

2024–2026: The Convergence of International Standards and Sector-Specific Guidance

A defining feature of 2024 is the rapid convergence of global sustainability standards:

• The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), established by the IFRS Foundation, has made considerable progress with its S1 and S2 standards. These frameworks aim to deliver decision-useful disclosures that align closely with financial reporting standards like IFRS, fostering cross-border comparability. They emphasize integrating climate and broader ESG data into mainstream financial reports, encouraging a holistic view of corporate sustainability.

• Regional initiatives are increasingly aligning with these global standards to foster interoperability:

  • The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), expanded in 2024, now mandates more detailed data collection, rigorous verification processes, and Scope 3 emissions disclosures—a critical component for climate risk management. This move underscores the EU’s commitment to robust, comparable, and reliable sustainability data.

  • The UK’s Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS), published in 2024, incorporate sector-specific guidance—notably for fashion, textiles, and infrastructure—aimed at making disclosures more industry relevant. Both the EU and UK frameworks are designed to be interoperable with ISSB standards, fueling the creation of a cohesive global reporting ecosystem.

• The GHG Protocol’s Phase 2 has introduced the Land Sector & Removals Standard (LSR), emphasizing nature-based climate solutions and independent assurance. This standard aims to enhance credibility in land use, sequestration, and carbon removal claims, addressing the persistent greenwashing concerns.

• Cross-sector initiatives like Kemira’s GRI Index for 2025 and MassDEP’s GHG Reporting Program exemplify ongoing efforts to streamline benchmarking and harmonize metrics across industries and regions, thereby reducing reporting complexity and enhancing comparability.

Significance: These collective efforts substantially mitigate fragmentation, enabling companies to produce comparable, decision-useful disclosures that boost investor confidence and support regulatory compliance globally.

---

Strengthening Regulatory and Legal Frameworks: Embedding Sustainability into Governance and Trade

Regulatory landscapes are increasingly embedding climate and sustainability data into corporate governance frameworks and international trade policies:

• The EU’s CSRD remains a cornerstone, requiring companies to upgrade internal data systems, implement verification protocols, and disclose Scope 3 emissions. This elevates sustainability data to a strategic priority, supporting risk management and long-term resilience.

• In the United States, despite political debates, regional initiatives like the New York Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act—approved in 2026—are gaining prominence. This law mandates comprehensive climate disclosures for companies operating within New York, with a focus on supply chain transparency and accuracy of climate data.

• Federal regulators such as ESMA and EU banking authorities continue to champion standardized, reliable disclosure regimes to bolster financial stability and market integrity.

• Trade policies are evolving to incorporate climate considerations:

  • The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), fully operational by 2026, requires detailed supply chain traceability and carbon footprint disclosures, effectively linking ESG compliance to international trade. This mechanism incentivizes companies to improve supply chain transparency.

  • Upcoming ICS2 customs regulations are further embedding climate-aligned trade practices into customs procedures, reinforcing sustainability’s role in global commerce.

Implications: Companies are increasingly expected to integrate sustainability data into governance frameworks and align operations with evolving trade regimes, which enhances business resilience but also introduces new compliance challenges.

---

Assurance and Digital Innovation: Building Trust and Enhancing Efficiency

Trust remains the cornerstone of credible sustainability reporting. To strengthen it, assurance standards and digital tools are progressing rapidly:

• The GHG Protocol’s Land Sector & Removals Standard (LSR) emphasizes independent assurance of land-based climate claims, addressing credibility gaps in nature-based solutions and offset projects. This development responds to investor and regulator concerns over greenwashing.

• Assurance providers like ASUENE and others are expanding services to align disclosures with frameworks such as GRI and ISSB, ensuring verification robustness.

• Digital platforms are transforming ESG reporting:

  • SIX Group’s real-time ESG dashboards and national disclosure portals (e.g., South Korea) facilitate regulatory compliance and stakeholder engagement.

  • Blockchain-based solutions, such as Carboledger, are verifying carbon credits and offsets, enabling trustworthy, real-time tracking of climate action claims.

  • AI-driven tools—for example, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is leveraging artificial intelligence to screen companies for ESG risks, improving risk assessment and investment decision-making.

  • Recent $40 million funding for Diginex highlights investor confidence in RegTech and digital verification solutions, signaling a market trend toward technology-enabled trust-building.

• Market indices are evolving to better support sustainable investment strategies:

  • MSCI’s Climate Paris Aligned PAB now incorporates global carbon budgets, aligning portfolios with climate science.

  • The Water Sustainability Index (WSI) is gaining prominence as a standardized measure of corporate water management, critical amid escalating water scarcity risks.

Significance: These technological innovations enhance data reliability, reduce verification costs, and accelerate transparent disclosures, fostering trust among investors, regulators, and the public.

---

Sector and Regional Specificity: Tailored Guidance and Capacity Building

Recognizing sectoral and regional diversity, targeted guidance and capacity-building initiatives are expanding:

• The UK SRS provides industry-specific guidance for fashion, infrastructure, and mining, promoting sectoral comparability.

• The GCC region is establishing regional sustainability benchmarks, with organizations like GRESB aligning reporting standards with GRI, TCFD, and CDP to support investment decisions.

• Large projects, such as Saudi Arabia’s Giga Projects, are embedding ESG maturity benchmarks aligned with national sustainability strategies.

• Capacity development remains vital:

  • Certifications like GARP’s SCR, CFA’s ESG credentials, and programs from PSCG Global are becoming industry standards for verification professionals.

  • Countries like India are launching upskilling initiatives focused on net-zero strategies, climate resilience, and measurement methodologies to bolster regional climate action.

---

Corporate Practices and Emerging Risks: Broadening Materiality and Biodiversity Disclosures

Leading companies are broadening their materiality assessments and disclosure scopes:

• The upcoming GRI 101 Biodiversity Standard, effective January 2026, will require disclosures on biodiversity impacts, stakeholder engagement, and restoration efforts. Recognizing biodiversity as a material risk is increasingly viewed as essential for long-term sustainability.

• Disclosures related to water management metrics like the Water Sustainability Index (WSI) are becoming more common amid water scarcity risks.

• Public commitments exemplify transparency:

  • Cardinal Health released its 2025 sustainability report, emphasizing progress toward science-based targets and integrated ESG strategies.

  • NewAge Industries announced plans to set science-based greenhouse gas reduction targets, aligning with climate science principles and decarbonization pathways.

Implication: These enhanced materiality assessments and standardized biodiversity disclosures aim to prevent greenwashing, ensuring credible, verifiable corporate responsibility.

---

Sectoral Focus: Energy, Metals, Mining, and Infrastructure

Key sectors are adopting focused strategies to align with evolving standards:

• Energy and metals firms are emphasizing carbon intensity metrics, climate disclosures, and pollution management.

• The mining sector faces increasing scrutiny over biodiversity impacts and Scope 3 emissions; upcoming standards like GRI 14 (expected in 2026) will standardize biodiversity disclosures.

• Countries such as Singapore are mandating ESG reporting for SMEs, emphasizing Scope 3 emissions and regulatory compliance, fostering early adoption across supply chains.

• The adoption of ISSB standards in emerging markets supports harmonized climate disclosures, strengthening investor confidence and market transparency.

---

Emerging Frontiers: Sustainable Infrastructure and Urban Development

Progress in sustainable infrastructure continues to accelerate:

• Initiatives like Green Cross UK’s SIπ (Sustainable Infrastructure Program) are integrating ESG principles into large infrastructure projects, emphasizing resilience, climate mitigation, and long-term sustainability.

• These frameworks support urban resilience strategies and climate adaptation initiatives, aligning with national and city-level commitments.

---

Current Status and Practical Implications

• The EU’s final reporting obligations clarify expectations around Scope 3 emissions, assurance, and digital reporting platforms. However, biodiversity disclosures remain an evolving frontier, requiring further clarity and standardization.

• Companies are advised to invest in robust data systems, integrate assurance processes early, and leverage digital platforms to enhance transparency and credibility.

• The rising influence of ESG ratings—linked increasingly to financial performance—as analyzed by sources like Oxford Law Blogs, underscores the importance for organizations to align social and environmental metrics with financial disclosures.

---

Recent Developments in 2024

Among notable recent events:

• The UK government announced the finalized UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS) on February 26, 2026, marking a significant step toward sector-specific and comprehensive ESG disclosures tailored for the UK market.

• The EU approved simplified sustainability reporting rules aimed at reducing implementation burdens, especially for SMEs, while maintaining transparency.

• Norway’s $2.2 trillion sovereign wealth fund is pioneering AI-based ESG risk screening tools, significantly enhancing risk management and investment decision-making.

• The GRC ecosystem continues to evolve with new certifications and capacity-building programs, reinforcing the professionalism of ESG verification.

---

In Conclusion

2024 is undeniably a landmark year where regulatory regimes, international standards, assurance frameworks, and digital innovations are converging to redefine sustainability reporting. The emphasis on credibility, comparability, and performance-based disclosures signals a collective movement toward a trustworthy, resilient, and integrated sustainability ecosystem.

This evolution supports risk mitigation, capital allocation, and long-term value creation, aligning corporate practices with global climate and social priorities. Organizations that embrace harmonized standards, invest in data integrity, and leverage cutting-edge technology will be better equipped to navigate this complex landscape—fostering trust and sustainability in an increasingly climate-conscious world.

---

Key Takeaways:

• Global convergence of standards (ISSB, EU CSRD, UK SRS) with sector-specific guidance enhances comparability.
• Strengthened assurance practices, including ISO 14064-1 verification and GHG Protocol enhancements, improve credibility.
• Regulatory integration of sustainability into governance and trade policies heightens business resilience.
• Digital tools such as AI, blockchain, and real-time dashboards are transforming data reliability and stakeholder engagement.
• Sectoral and regional tailoring alongside capacity-building initiatives are expanding disclosure quality and industry readiness.
• Emerging focus areas include biodiversity, Scope 3 emissions, and climate risk management.

By staying ahead of these developments, companies can position themselves as trustworthy leaders in the evolving sustainability landscape—driving value, resilience, and responsible growth in a rapidly changing world.